C   O   N   T   E   N   T   S 
Pg 31

FORWARD/NEXT PAGE >





AN UNAUTHORIZED COMMENT
ON THE BOOK OF THE LAW:
THE ALKHEMION WORKING
PART ONE

By Shade Oroboros 817

N U I T H * H A D
N U I T H A D I T
N U * H A D I T H


0. The Genesis of Thelema
00. The Gods of AL & Khem
000. The Previous Commentators

I. AL-MANDAL: the Infinite Circle of Nuit
II. AL-QUTUB: the Center-Point of Hadit
III. SAIF AL-HAQ: the Sword of Truth: Ra-Hoor-Khuit

A. A Century After AL
B. Some Notes on Liber AL
C. Origins Of Abrahadabra



0. The Genesis of Thelema

"The Aeon is a Child at Play...
- Heraclitus, around 500 BC

In March of 1904 the infamous English magician Aleister Crowley was visiting Egypt on honeymoon with his wife Rose. Fresh from the raging internecine battles surrounding the collapse of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, and by then largely defining his spiritual quest in terms of Buddhism, Crowley was somewhat disillusioned with magick at this time. Nevertheless, we are told that he performed a ritual as a demonstration for his new bride, and was very surprised when she entered a state of trance and began to insist that "They are waiting for you!" and saying “It is all about the Child, all Osiris” and “He who waits is Horus.”

Taking her to the Boulak Museum in Cairo, he tested Rose by asking her to show him an image of Horus, and was quite amused when she passed by several. Then she pointed to a glass case in the distance and insisted that this was what he sought, and it turned out to be a small funerary stele (XXVIth Dynasty) for a priest of ancient Thebes named Ankh-af-na-Khonsu. This point of contact depicted a scene of the enthroned hawk-headed sun-god Horus with the priest making offerings before him; above them are a falcon-winged solar disk and the surrounding image of Nuit, goddess of the heavens, framing the whole composition. Very significantly for Crowley, this artifact was listed in the museum catalog as Stele #666; it later became known as the Stele of Revealing. This is the Foundation Myth of Thelema (which is the greek word for Will, paired with Agape or Love, both of whose numerology totals 93; hence his system is known as the 93 Current).

Rose continued to insist that forces from beyond were seeking to contact him, and directed him to perform a ritual in a room with many mirrors and employing some correspondences alien to his Golden Dawn training, which he summarized as:

“To be performed before a window open to the E. or N. without incense. The room to be filled with jewels, but only diamonds to be worn. A sword, unconsecrated, 44 pearl beads to be told. Stand. Bright daylight at 12.30 noon. Lock doors. White robes. Bare feet. Be very loud. Saturday. Use the Sign of Apophis and Typhon.”

So, he acquired a translation of the text from the stele, rendered it into verse, devised what he called 'The Ritual of Invocation According to the Divine Vision of W. the Seer', and performed it upon March 20th, now known as the Equinox of the Gods (and documented in his book of the same name, a full account of the experience, quoted above). The result changed his life, the course of modern occult philosophy, and perhaps even future history (time will tell!).

At the hours of noon on April 8th, 9th, and 10th in the year 1904, Aleister Crowley received the transmission known as Liber AL vel Legis: The Book of the Law in the Victorious City of Cairo in Egypt. While at first he claims to have rejected it, this philosophically revolutionary vision of a New Aeon of Thelema was ultimately to radically transform his understanding of the universe, his practice of the Great Work, and his legacy to the innocently unsuspecting world.

I suppose I should note more recent claims that these events actually began upon April 1st, and that he may have obscured this fact due to concerns of it being seen as an April Fool’s joke, and/or possibly Easter… and also a theory that he was perhaps subliminally influenced by a play involving Horus (The Beloved of Hathor & Shrine of the Golden Hawk) written by fellow member Florence Farr of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, which was also permeated with Egyptian motifs. There are also many other foreshadowing’s of Crowley’s Abbey of Thelema earlier in history, in the writings of Francois Rabelais, the orgies of Sir Francis Dashwood’s Monks of Medmenham (better known as the Hellfire Club), and even St. Augustine’s maxim “Love and do what you will”. Magical currents, like archetypes, may run underground for centuries before reappearing in full flood. Omens happen.

Liber AL vel Legis s.f. CCXX, as it came to be called, is very obviously quite different in tone and style to any of Crowley's other works at that time. A prose poem in three chapters totaling 220 verses, it is primarily expressed in terms of an ancient Egyptian cosmology, yet its rather surreal narrative stream of consciousness might also contain encoded echoes of visionary elements reminiscent of many other inspired influences: arcane, hermetic, alchemical, gnostic, astrological and qabalistic lore; wisdom of Taoism and Tantra, and the works of Blake, Milton, and Nietzsche; the Angelic Enochian workings of Dee & Kelly in Elizabethan times; the Tarot and the Golden Dawn; modern physics and psychology; and clearly the King James Bible, especially Ezekiel and the Book of Revelation, and the Koran.

These are the secret archetypes of our collective memory, our cultural heritage. As John Lennon once said, “A dream you dream alone is only a dream. A dream you dream together is reality.” A good idea whose time has come can change the world. The word 'Liber', by the way, means 'book'.

Liber AL somehow merges cosmology, philosophy, politics, ethics, prophecy, art, sensuality and magick into a coherent whole, expressed through the mysterious personas of three pagan cosmic god-forms.  Savagely beautiful, erotic and cryptic, subtle and violent, with gorgeously bizarre jewels of imagery, strange numerological riddles and existential, spiritual, immoral and apolitical musings, the text somehow forms a unique and coherent whole that speaks to the hearts and souls of many of us. While much (but not all) of it may be congruent with the rather unusual personality of Crowley, the voice is clearly not truly his. Indeed, he always insisted that Liber AL was not just something that erupted from his own deep mind, but verifiable proof of contact with a disembodied consciousness from outside. Perhaps all Holy Books are somewhat influenced by the minds of their Prophets, as a ray of light is tinted with color as it passes through a jewel; but the lives of such seers and shamans often seem to have somehow prepared them to receive a vision and to explain it as well: Moses wandered in the desert, some say Jesus spent his missing years in India, Mohammed meditated in a cave and the Buddha under a tree, and Crowley entered into the Vault of the Adepts. His quest through magick and yoga clearly made him something of an appropriate instrument of the gods, and like these others he taught. Nevertheless, I somehow doubt that he saw this one coming…

Other than parables and sixth-hand accounts we really know comparatively little about the personalities of most of history’s earlier prophets. Moses was averse to asking for directions (leading to forty years in the desert), Jesus did magic tricks at the Wedding of Cana and provided catering services with loaves and fishes, and Mohammed inadvertently created a vast tourist industry for Mecca and Medina. Crowley, on the other hand, is almost embarrassingly well documented (with various levels of reliability) and even wrote his own Autohagiography. While most religious leaders have laid down rigid dogmas to be followed slavishly, he is almost unprecedented and very modern in his exaltation of the path of the Individual. His own individualism was rampant to the celebrity-tabloid level, and his love of the camera preserves many images for the benefit of posterity. It was once pointed out to me that the semi-religious movement begun by Osho Rajneesh was probably the first to be fully documented from the beginning in sound recordings, film and video.

In reading Liber AL we must also confront the oversized personality of Crowley himself, as the human vehicle of its transmission. Looking at his later life, he often seems to be a battlefield of the conflicting conditions of the Old Age and the New Aeon. What made him the unexpected lens that caught this ray of light? Having Christianity rammed down his throat as a child imprinted the Bible into his psyche, while the Golden Dawn later provided the Qabalistic and Egyptian symbolic systems in which the Book was encoded. From some strange ferment of his deep mind the possibility of prophecy emerged, and his life experience allowed him to interpret and expound it. In ancient times prophecy was a profession. Did not IHVH inspire Moses and Jesus, and Allah Mohammed? Did their own lives not somehow prepare them for these great missions of destiny? Were their Words in turn not activated by God?
Who notably moves in very mysterious ways?

Comparisons might also be made with other transmissions even more recent: C.G. Jung's Septem Sermones ad Mortuos (Seven Sermons to the Dead), G.’.D.’. poet W.B. Yeats’ odd work A Vision, Blavatsky's Book of Dyzan, Timothy Leary’s The Starseed Transmissions, the Principia Discordia, the Book of the Sub-Genius, and even OAHSPE and the Book of Mormon. And if we remain even remotely willing to suspend our disbelief sufficiently to accept the validity of any of these (especially Mormonism), it would seem rather unfair not to extend the same courtesy to Mr. Crowley. Much of his later writing is in a sense a commentary upon this prophecy of Liber AL vel Legis; however his most succinct message, generally known as the Short or Tunis Comment, reads as follows:

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
The study of this Book is forbidden. It is wise to destroy this copy after the first reading. Whosoever disregards this does so at his own risk and peril. These are most dire.
Those who discuss the contents of this Book are to be shunned by all, as centres of pestilence. All questions of the Law are to be decided only by appeal to my writings, each for himself.
There is no law beyond Do what thou wilt.
Love is the law, love under will.
- The priest of the princes, Ankh-f-a-Khonsu

If we take that as an absolute, then my own attempt to engage this transmission in an open dialogue might technically be regarded as sacrilege; however, such a cheerful blasphemy is still in full accord with the spirit of the book itself, and the decision to embrace Thelema by disobeying this dictum becomes the first test of each neophyte. Besides, Crowley can hardly have intended everything he ever wrote (even in Class A!) to be considered as gospel, as one of the man’s few saving graces was his sense of humor. As a Guru, he was well known for jerking his disciple’s chains (although always with the clear intention of breaking them) in all kinds of unusual ways. It is not really necessary for people to actually destroy the book after reading it in order to successfully misunderstand it, although it can be a very interesting burnt offering. What I am doing here is just trying to explain this strange and beautiful vision, as I understand it, both for my own pleasure and for all others now among the living.

Those who study Crowley’s work are most often drawn to his magical practices, and while his system was largely drawn from the Golden Dawn’s qabalistic paradigm, it was also inspired by the eastern practices of Yoga and Tantra and even Sufism. This merging of diverse cultural traditions is a key element of the 93 Current, the theory being that with the ‘Dawning of the Age of Aquarius’ the Aeon of the Child is being born, that with these changing astrological influences we are entering a New Age. This mutation of the cosmic forces is altering the Noosphere of the human mind or the Jungian collective unconscious, as well as the surreal estate of the Astral Plane, the contents of the Akashic Record, the Spheres & Paths of the Tree of Life & Death itself. Horus as the Zeitgeist, the Spirit of the Age, the ruling God or Archon of our Times, is present at the New Birth of a New Earth, a Spiral of Change. The mythic and psychic forces of this Word upon our World are transforming all of Humanity.

Our spiritual consciousness acts through the will and its instruments upon material objects, in order to produce changes which will result in the establishment of the new conditions of consciousness which we wish. That is the definition of Magick.
- Aleister Crowley, Confessions

The High Magick spoken of in Liber AL is ultimately creative and deeply personal, and centered in the Self of each sovereign individual. Our credo is: “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. Every man and every woman is a star. Love is the law, love under will.” The meaning of this is that every single person should make his or her own existence into a work of Art, a celebration of Being, a forging of Destiny. To become who we are really meant to be, to fully control how we live, to fulfill our core purpose as well as our every desire, is the meaning of the Crowleyan concept of True Will: not merely an indulgence in random caprice, but giving life to our highest aspirations, fully experiencing our souls to the ultimate extent of bliss, through every brilliant and bizarre excess we can imagine. There is no salvation or damnation here; just the living light of countless conscious Stars, burning brightly for all time and thus imprinted into the diamond fabric of Forever, each shining as a beacon to all, a call to freedom and ecstasy and adventure, to unique moments of meaning in a strange and miraculous Universe. Buddhism sees the transitory nature of all things as Sorrow, while Thelema proclaims that this Dance is eternal Joy. Which do you prefer?

This strange revelation is now regarded as a prophecy of the age to come, and as the sacred grimoire of its magick; to absorb it by deep study is therefore the work and play of every Thelemic magician. The quantum cosmology it describes is perfectly modern: the innermost individual consciousness or viewpoint of each observer continuously interacts with the entire universe personified as the Great Goddess who is Everything and Nothing. All aspects of the worlds we think we know are created by their blissful love-play, and are to be freely experienced to the fullest in every possible or impossible way.

The conceptual framework from which this paradigm emerges is based upon the notion of a procession of symbolic periods in human history: first, the Aeon of Isis the Great Mother goddess, the time of paganism and shamanism, hunting and tribal life; followed by the now-fortunately-ending Aeon of Osiris the Father god, when monotheism and revealed religions, agriculture and writing and cities took hold. Now we are entering the Aeon of Horus the Child or the Son, a time of both rapidly advancing technology and an anarchistic magical revival, of freedom from imposed dogmas, of revolution and ecstasy, expressed by an archetype whose double or androgynous nature reconciles the matriarchy and patriarchy of the previous ages. The sequence concludes with the mysterious future Aeon of Maat the Daughter, whose balance of Truth has been foreshadowed today, but has yet to fully unfold. This fourfold paradigm of human evolution is often seen as rising from the prehistoric Nameless Aeons, and will perhaps be followed in turn by an unimaginable Wordless Aeon.

It is my intention to allow this present work to follow naturally the text of Liber AL itself, but perhaps this might occur more lucidly if I briefly introduce the primal and cosmic deities whose messages it expresses.



00. The Gods of AL & Khem

O King, you are the essence of all the gods,
and Horus has protected you,
you having become the essence of him.
- Utterance 589, Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts

The First Chapter contains the words of the Goddess described as Nuit, the Queen of Heaven, the all-embracing body of space and time, the Universe Herself, defined as ‘Infinite Space, and the Infinite Stars thereof’; and this qabalistic notariqon of ‘Infinite Space, Infinite Stars’ clearly identifies her as ISIS, and shows her double nature as both the diamond void of empty space as well as the physical form of the galaxies and all within them. In ancient Egypt the great goddess Isis is often portrayed as paired with her sister Nephthys as the twin guardians of life & death:

"... they understand the horizontal circle, which divides the invisible part of the world, which they call Nephthys, from the visible, to which they give the name Isis; and as this circle equally touches upon the confines of both light and darkness, it may be looked upon as common to them both...
- Robert Temple, The Sirius Mystery

The usage of this Egyptian pantheon runs through Thelema, and we may therefore syncretistically identify her with the whole range of Egyptian goddesses, for the many deities of the Two Lands or Double Kingdom of ancient Khem constantly transform in the subtle interplay of their aspects and attributes. Emerging from the primordial waters of the void at the beginning of time, these ‘neters’ or avatars or emanations or archetypical principles form an ever-shifting whirl of kaleidoscopic images, like the Tantric Dance of Shakti, which express the various forms that the divine may assume. Prominent among those who are most clearly linked to Nuit (variously spelled as Nu, Nuit, and Nuith in Liber AL) are these:

First is the Nun, the vast dark chaotic ocean of the waters of space which predate the creation of the universe, and which is usually seen as more of a cosmic principle than a personified being.

Second and most clearly is Nut, the night-sky goddess represented as a beautiful woman, her body jeweled with stars, arched over the world. At times Nut is also depicted as the divine Cow, an animal form also taken by both Isis and Hathor, whose four hooves rest upon the four quarters of the earth and whose belly is speckled with stars. Nut’s symbol is a water-jar.

Third, there is also an early royal goddess named Neith, who might well reflect the spelling of Nuith. As a dually sexed gynander who is seen as the virgin mother of the Sun, she rules both warfare and skillful crafts, and also became (like Isis) one of the great universal forms of the Goddess. She is most often associated with Athena, and also in Greek terms the celestial Hera (like Hathor, also a cow-goddess) who might possibly be cognate to Nuit as a personification of the sky. The symbol of Neith is two crossed arrows.

Fourth, there is the above-mentioned Nephthys, sister of Isis, wife of Set, and mother of jackal-headed Anubis; a very old but rather shadowy figure without a well-defined cult, but who may indeed have ruled in the realm of death, while Isis controlled the fields of life. Her symbol is a hieroglyph that represents a house with a door, and she was the guardian of both the homes of mortals and the temples of the Gods.

Fifth, Isis herself is among the best-known deities of Egypt, as a Great Mother (of the god Horus), a Mistress of Magick, a universal goddess who later absorbed the symbolism of many others in the pantheon, and whose worship became widespread throughout much of the Mediterranean world and the even wider Roman empire. Her symbol is the throne, and she was also strongly linked to the sacred kingship. Her iconography as a seated queen nursing the child Horus was later appropriated by
the Virgin Mary as the Mother of God (giving rise to an early and very weird German translation of Liber AL which actually replaced Nuit’s name with Mary!).

Sixth, her most primal form is Hathor, the ‘House of Hor’ or bride of Horus (or of Ra as the Sun), who is seen as the day sky as Nuit is the night. She is found throughout all of Egypt from very early times and great annual festivals and processions ritually commemorated their sacred marriage. In Liber AL her name appears transliterated as Ahathoor, and she is an important yet secret presence in the book, perhaps missed by Crowley due to the chauvinism of his day.

In Egypt (the cow) was revered primarily as a representation of the sky goddess Hathor, who was seen as mother and spouse of the Sun; as the mother of Horus; as the grandmother of the Egyptian king; as the goddess of joy, dance and music (in the form of a young woman); as the image of hope and the renewal of life; as the living soul of trees; and as the mistress of the mountains and the dead. Among other forms, she could appear as gleaming gold or assume the shape of a lioness.
- The Herder Symbol Dictionary

Seventh, perhaps, is Our Lady Babalon! And all her lovely avatars… many if not all the other goddesses may also be assimilated as forms of this Great Universal Goddess Nuit, including Tefnut and Sekhmet and Maat.

The goddess Nut was primarily the personification of the vault of the heavens… the firmament which separated the earth from the encircling waters of chaos out of which the world had been created… she was not only the great sky whose ‘laughter’ was the thunder, and whose ‘tears’ were the rain, but she was also the ‘mother’ of the heavenly bodies who were believed to enter her mouth and emerge again from her womb each day. The sun was thus said to travel through the body of the goddess during the night hours and the stars traveled through her during the day.

Several scholars have suggested that Nut may have originally represented the Milky Way, as Spell 176 of the Book of the Dead refers to this broad band of stars which crosses the night sky and the following spell begins with an invocation of Nut, and some representations of the Ramesside Period show stars around the figure of the goddess as well as on her body. There is astronomical evidence which may support the equation. Ronald Wells has shown that in the pre-dawn sky at winter solstice in pre-dynastic Egypt the Milky Way would have looked remarkably like a stretched out figure with arms and legs touching the horizons in exactly the manner in which the goddess was often later depicted. Furthermore, at the time of the winter solstice the sun would have arisen in the area of the goddess’s figure - her pudendum - from which it would be imagined to be born, just as nine months earlier, at the spring equinox, the sun would have set in the position of the goddess’s head - suggesting it was being swallowed.

Nut also became inextricably associated with the concept of resurrection in Egyptian funerary beliefs, and the dead were believed to become stars in the body of the goddess.
- Richard H. Wilkinson, The Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt

The Second Chapter expresses the god as Had, Hadit, or Hadith, the omnipresent center of all consciousness, the seed of the true self, the universal yet unique point of view wherein every man or woman is seen as a holy star in the infinite body of Nuit. This entity is usually depicted as a hawk-winged solar orb or disk, a symbol also popular in Babylon as well:

"An ancient conception of heaven held that it was the wings of a falcon stretched out over the world. A drawing on a First Dynasty tomb shows the solar bark, together with a Horus falcon, on a pair of wings thus symbolizing heaven. From the Fifth Dynasty onwards a sun disc was placed between the pair of wings, hence the image of heaven became a solar symbol. Originally the winged disc belonged to the god Behdet whose epithet was 'he with colored plumage' and who had already merged with Horus at an early date. With that, Behdeti began to assume the role of Horus who was identified with the king. The two uraei which surrounded the solar disc towards the end of the Old Kingdom were a part of royal symbolism; there are New Kingdom representations in which the snake's heads wear the Upper and Lower Egyptians crowns respectively. After the New Kingdom the winged disc appeared as a symbol of protection above temple doors and at the top of stelae."
- Manfred Lurker, Gods and Symbols of Ancient Egypt

In terms of Liber AL (and its visual template, the ancient artifact known as the ‘Stele of Revealing‘) this deity is thus identified with the Horus of solar fire who is portrayed as the winged globe, Heru-Behutet; however, Hadit is also said by some (notably Kenneth Grant) to be one with Set, the dark god of chaos and magick, who is in some senses the twin brother (or uncle, in later versions) of Horus; they battle and are then fully reconciled in a cosmic drama of sacred kingship. Red Set is the rebel, the outsider, the god of Chaos and the desert, discord and windstorms, strangers and foreigners: perhaps thus a suitable symbol for the zeitgeist of our era. In some ways he is a Dark Star or Black Flame, a living paradox. His magical current may also be seen manifesting in the Temple of Set.

As the quintessential polarity, Nu and Had may be seen as any of the pairs of gods in Egyptian (or any other) mythology: as the dark waters of the Nun and the lotus-born sun-god Atum-Ra who rises from them; as the primal formative dyads of Tefnut and Shu (heat & moisture and cool air & light), or Nut and Geb (who are the arching vault of heaven and body of earth); as Isis and Osiris, or Nephthys and Set; as Sekhmet and Ptah, Mut and Amoun, Maat and Thoth... the interwoven pantheons of Egypt are archaic yet sophisticated, elegant and evocative, and reward deep study and devotion with arcane insight and sorcerous power. The ancient pagan gods are often very complex personalities, like any other living and growing beings, and in exploring the energies and symbols of these archetypes one achieves new heights and depths of meaning. An all-to-often-quoted aphorism of modern hermetics claims “All gods are one god, all goddesses are one goddess, and there is one initiator.” That Initiator is now Ra-Hoor-Khuit.

There has been some debate (and even considerable controversy) about the etymology of Hadit as used in Liber AL; I quote from the online version of Crowley’s Comments, with thanks:

“{WEH NOTE: "Hadit" is the spelling of "Bahadit" found on the Stele. This is unusual in that most Egyptian spelling of the period maintained the "Ba" prefix. Crowley adopted the spelling from the Stele, and it is common as well in Liber AL. This "Hadit" or "Bahadit" is the winged sun disk, used over the entrances of temple doorways, at the tops of stele and elsewhere in Egyptian art and architecture. Interestingly, the full name of Ra-Hoor-Khuit is Ra-Heru-Khuti-Ba-Hadi, Ra-Horus who flies into the disk of the sun. -information researched by Fr. Ebony. Liber AL was received during that part of the year in which Ra-Heru-Khuti-Ba-Hadi was said by the ancient Egyptians to rule the decan occupied by the Sun. It is not known if Crowley was aware of this particular deity being astrologically "on official watch" at the time.}”

In my opinion any of the gods may be seen as Hadit, especially the creator gods, but essentially whichever deity best expresses your own nature. There is an academic concept called henotheism, simply put, that any God is the True God, every aspect of the divine is equally valid. Whether you worship Odin or Krishna or the judeo-christian-islamic hybrid, God is whomever you choose wisely. Egyptian paganism was not monolithic, and accepted various concepts and narratives as all containing Truth. In Heliopolis the Supreme Being was Atum, later merged with the sun-god as Atum-Ra. At Memphis the creator was Ptah, at Hermopolis the ibis-headed Thoth. Any god may be understood as the true god, since we are not equipped to perceive the totality of such a being. No one name can encompass the universe. Find your own!

The Third Chapter more fully expresses Horus (the High One) as the Lord of the New Aeon; in ancient Egypt he appears under very many names and forms in different locations and historical periods. Many of the major pantheons of Khem (and there were any number of local cosmologies) were ruled by father/mother/son triads: Osiris, Isis, Horus are probably still the best known to the casual reader, but there are also Amoun, Mut, Khonsu or Ptah, Sekhmet, Nefertum or Amoun-Ra, Hathor, Ihy and others who are prominent. So Horus is the Holy Child, the ever-becoming one, and the defining god of the sacred kingship: every deceased pharaoh became one with his father Osiris, and every son and royal heir was then crowned as the living and incarnate Horus. In later times all humans were seen as resurrected by or joining with the group-soul of Osiris as the god of the dead in the afterlife, and perhaps today we may consider ourselves as the embodied forms of Horus, the Crowned and Conquering Child of AL: each of us arising as a star in the body of Nuit, which is one of the earliest known models of the soul in the Egyptian afterlife.

Horus is seen in a sense as Twins, as having a double aspect: Horus the Elder, the solar lord of kingship and victory in battle, the incarnation of the supreme sun-god Ra; and Horus the Younger, son of Isis and Osiris, the innocent holy child, the eternally reborn Babe in the Egg or Lotus (which are both symbols of unfolding life and essential elements of the various versions of the Creation myth). In Liber AL they are named Ra-Hoor-Khuit and Hoor-par-kraat (and as several other variations discussed below); they may represent the various processes of turning outwards and inwards, of union with the external Nuit by eternal expansion and the internal Hadit by an infinite contraction, of the paths of active magick and passive mysticism or yoga, of speech and silence, of the light and the darkness, of the central star and the boundless cosmic void spinning and spiraling with whirlpool galaxies.

In Egyptian cosmology the supreme sun-god Ra sails over the sky in the solar boat by day, but during the night his orbital journey passes through the gates and caverns of the underworld, the Duat or land of the dead, and is assaulted by monsters of the deep who are eternally battled by the company of the gods who sustain our world; these twin realms of waking and dream (or nightmare) reflect the creative tension that cycles between Primordial Chaos and Divine Order. This polarity and infinite potential is also what makes us fully human. The Hero’s Journey of the sun-god Ra-Hoor is also the evolutionary path of the individuation of the soul or psyche in the New Aeon, now going beyond the pendulum swing between death & rebirth and into the knowledge (gnosis) of the continuity of consciousness: 'the unfragmentary non-atomic fact of my universality' (AL c.I, v.26). That is why the Tree of Life & Death has two sides, why the Taoist concept of Yin and Yang originally referred to the shadowed and sunlit sides of a mountain, why Horus manifests in twin forms, and why N'Aton appears half-dark, half-bright. With magick the psychological is also spiritual. We contain all possibilities. Polarity is not exactly the same thing as duality. The Kingdom of Heaven is within you.

In order of appearance in the text, and assuming that there is meaning in every aspect and numeration of the orthography of AL, the variant spellings are:
Hoor-paar-kraat
Ra-hoor-khuit
Hoor
Heru-pa-kraath
Ra-hoor-khu
Ra-hoor-khut
Hrumachis
Heru-ra-ha
Hoor-pa-kraat

The following quotation makes a very important point about the Formula of the Aeon as comprising Mother, Father and Child:

Ra-Hor Khut was, as the Boulaq translation tells us, “chief of the gods” who faces Ankh-f-na-khonsu on the stele. Thankfully, there is a god of Egypt’s history, spelled only in a slightly different manner, as Ra-heru-Khuti. This is a compound name of the gods, of Ra, Horus and Khuti. There is only one reference with Crowley’s spelling of “Khuit.” She was an ancient female deity from Anthribes that later became directly associated with Hathor. It is not surprising then, that Crowley chose the spelling of a goddess that was the personification of the great power of nature which was perpetually conceiving and creating. She was “the mother of her father, “ and “the daughter of her son.” Thus, Ra-Hoor-Khuit was the Father, the Son and the Mother, a potent triad in one magical formula. And after saying this all-encompassing powerful name, what could possibly be conveyed but the power of silence, with the sign of silence.
- Soror Lutea, Who And What Are Those Egyptian References In Liber Resh?

This indicates a very radical change in the historical relations between deity and humanity: Mother and Father are inevitably external, caring yet different beings, and often seen as distant or superior. The Child, however, is All of Us: we are by nature and in our very own being the manifestation of consciousness, and hence of divinity itself. This may lead us on to an essential concept of the Maatian system: N’Aton, the potential group-mind or collective existence of humanity, the fully evolved soul of our race, perhaps Teilhard de Chardin’s Omega Point, that ultimate goal toward which humanity strives. If this is indeed the path of our spiritual evolution, then the Aeon of Horus is the unique development of the fully self-realized Individual, which must be completed and then transformed into the awakening of Unity that becomes the soul of our species in the Aeon of Maat. We must first attain our own True Wills in order to create the Next Step, the World-Mind, the Future Perfect.

The goddess Maat was one of the major cosmic forces of the Egyptian pantheon, seen almost as an abstract concept, representing Truth, balance, justice, breath, life, order, law and straightness. She is very like the Chinese concept of Tao or the Way. Her symbols are the Feather against which the soul was weighed in the Scales in the hall of judgment after death, and the strange narrow plinth with one straight and one angled edge usually seen beneath the Throne, which represents the primeval mound or First Hill that emerged from the waters of space at the time of Creation; it is also perhaps a measuring rod, and is seen in the ramps that led in to the inner sanctum of temples. The first duty of the Pharaoh as King was to maintain the order and justice of the world. She is often portrayed as winged, and images of her were given as offerings at the end of rituals to sustain the World. Maat might now be represented by the hieroglyph of the Mouth, as Horus is by the Eye.

An essential key to The Book of the Law is the word AL (or EL, meaning God), which reverses as LA (Not or naught), implying the identity or reconciliation of Had & Nu, All & Nothing, being & non-existence, life & death. These dual modes of reality form the pattern of the universal dance, just as linked pairs of opposites largely defined the Gnostic chain of Aeons and Archons.

The constant themes of duality, paradox, twins, doubles, reflections, significant reversals of words, puns, and essential polarity are at the core of a system perhaps best expressed in the metamathematical formula of 0 = 2. In Thelemic Taoist terms, the Void (Tao, the Way) manifests itself as pairs of opposites (the Yin and the Yang). Our creation oscillates between cosmos & chaos, universe & emptiness, Hadit & Nuit. Divinity seen simply as the One, which perpetually obsesses most religious philosophies, is a shifting chimera that exists as an ongoing yet momentary paradox of unity or in-betweeness, in the 'hieros-gamos' or sacred marriage of the two extremes. Perhaps one way to express this is that we are equally defined by What One Is and What One Is Not.

The Book of the Law can be read on many levels and in many ways, and everyone must find their own method of interpreting the formulas presented. Ultimately the path must be shown by the psychological formula of ‘solve et coagula’, or analysis and synthesis. Experience must be examined, divided into its component parts, reunited, and ultimately absorbed into a burst of orgasmic energy which transforms the individual, for in the words of ancient alchemy often quoted by the luminous scholar and psychologist Carl Jung: “The Self is a circle whose center is everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere found.” Nuit is the infinite circle or Zero, and Hadit is the dual-natured secret center, and a circle with a point in the middle is both the Eye and the symbol of the Sun, which is Ra-Hoor-Khuit.

Perhaps the most personally essential element of this vision is the energizing unity of Love and Will (Agape and Thelema), of Nuit and Hadit living as their incarnate avatars the Scarlet Woman and the Great Wild Beast, as perception and action, Night and Day, silver and gold. Many become two, two one, one naught.
‘Every man and every woman is a star.’

The Holy Book or Scripture is anterior to all things, but it gradually reveals itself as that which precipitates breath to form Heaven, Earth and the Space Between. Image of the world in superimposed sheets that are individually transparent and readable, it represents a pledge of alliance with the innumerable deities and the function between Heaven and Earth.

The Book is bestowed upon the adept so that he can discover the secret form and hidden geography of the stars and the celestial currents of the heavens, of the mountains and rivers on earth, and of the vital circuits of the human body. It invites the adept, both within himself as well as externally, to travel throughout all of the immense universe. Striding forth and measuring the universe, he enjoys and elevates himself - though he is unmoved - during his thousand-mile journey.

The scriptures are dramatic plays of light, or of light upon light, where the eyes and stars illuminate the way - scintillating mirrors that reflect with a doubled and redoubled brilliance so that mysteries are uncovered and truth is unveiled. They are also repetitive games with new beginnings and new twists, with reversals and involutions. They are like: the coiling of a snake, a guarded treasure, a closed hand, a pledge of allegiance within a casket, interlocking and circling steps, accumulated energy, a sheltered enclosure at the end of a cave, a glance that mirrors itself, something unmoved in itself, one page facing another page.”
- Isabelle Robinet, Taoist Meditation: The Mao-Shan Tradition of Great Purity

I took this lovely quotation from Peter Lamborn Wilson’s marvelous “Shower of Stars” Dream & Book, which excellently expounds upon the nature of magical texts. Much of what he writes is applicable to Liber AL. He is also known as Hakim Bey.

I would also add that Crowley’s view of magick and myth was heavily influenced by Eliphas Levi (who he claimed as a previous incarnation), and by Sir James Frazer’s classic The Golden Bough, and also the egyptological writings of Sir E.A.Wallis Budge of the British Museum… who is unfortunately a century out of date. Immersion in the culture of ancient Egypt is invaluable in contacting these gods, and I would recommend more contemporary (and very readable) sources like Geraldine Pinch, Barbara Watterson, Richard H. Wilkinson, Rosalie David, George Hart, Erik Hornung, Robert Ritner, Manfred Lurker, Christian Jacq, Barbara S. Lesko, Stephen Quirke, Hans Dieter Betz, R.T. Rundle Clark, Jan Assmann and Jeremy Naydler.

However, it is also extremely important to note that while the powerful Egyptian deities explored above all flow into those of Thelema, they have now evolved into very different forms, just as human thought and modern cultures have mutated. The cosmic deities or functions or principals or aspects of ourselves found in Liber AL are something miraculous and completely new. They are the gods of the Space Age, not of the Stone Age, and manifest uniquely and individually in all of us.



000. The Previous Commentators

"The Book of the Law or Liber Legis, as the communication from Aiwass is called, is a series of dithyrambic verses with more exclamation marks than any other work of similar length."   
- John Symonds, The Great Beast

As observed above, Crowley reserved to himself the ultimate authority to comment upon this transmission, although that has not always stopped his various heirs (or me!). The book itself insists upon the absolute preservation of the original text, and states that Crowley must have the last word in interpreting it, but also that others will follow him. He labored for years upon his own very thoughtful and extensive and essential commentaries, and in fact his entire body of magical work must be considered as an expansion of Liber AL. Yet even in his own lifetime he saw the need for another hand to edit this massive work, for in the original form he rambles on considerably, and quite frankly his attitudes and style sometimes tend to reflect the fact that he was coked up to the gills for much of that time (more obviously in the 1920 New Comment period than in the relatively concise 1912 Old Comment). In a letter to Cambridge historian E.M. Butler he once wrote: “Some 25 years ago I wrote a Commentary on The Book of the Law – over a quarter of a million words of the most turgid and incomprehensible hogwash ever penned. Certain adventurous spirits, however, have claimed to have found specks of gold in the silt.” There are also his incomplete 1923 Djeridensis Comment, and the account and analysis of the events in The Equinox of the Gods in 1936, and others that are believed not to have survived. See also his Confessions and The Temple of Solomon the King.

I do not say this to knock Crowley, who always took his writing very seriously indeed and steadily evolved his literary skills as well as his understanding of the transmission. Indeed, one of the strongest arguments against his being a mere charlatan is the genuine devotion and discipline he maintained to expounding and spreading this vision. I would add that since so much of his work is devoted to defining technical aspects of his Magick, these various comments may be among the clearest unfolding of his personal understanding of philosophy (a subject to which he devoted considerable study) and of his political thought (much of which is clearly a half-baked, obsolete, and idiosyncratic product of his upbringing and times). I’m just being honest here. We should keep in mind that the man was born in 1875 and writing the New Comment in the 1920s. Most importantly, we should remember that he had a ferociously wicked sense of humor, and loved to shock people.

Zen authority Alan Watts had this to say about Crowley:

"For myself, I make no judgment. It is possible that a man can be such a fraud as to be an incomparable and magical fraud. It is also possible that a man of high compassion and wisdom can play at being a fraud so as not to become an idol or the founder of a formal religion. Great and powerful men, in the religious dimension, are invariably regarded gods by some and as devils by others."
(San Francisco Examiner, on 2/28/1970)

To date his Comment has been published in three (and a half?) forms. Perhaps the most complete version is The Magical and Philosophical Commentaries on the Book of the Law, edited by John Symonds & Kenneth Grant and lovingly published in a beautiful edition by 93 Press in 1974 (with the obverse and reverse of the Stele embossed in gold on the front and back covers). Mr. Grant is the Outer Head of the London-based Typhonian Order, a mutation of the O.T.O. born from his Nu-Isis Lodge, and his own works, especially the nine core volumes of the Triple Typhonian Trilogies, contain considerable deep study of AL, often as seen from a Tantric or extra-terrestrial and or even Lovecraftian perspective, and provide many of the most innovative and important insights subsequent to the work of the Great Wild Beast himself. Personally, I was enormously influenced by Grant in my misspent youth. While I will mention some of his insights in passing, I will refer you to his own works for a much fuller understanding of his concepts, which really deserve to be read as he presents them. This is perhaps a facile cop-out to excuse me from rereading them all at this time, as well as courtesy to a living author who is one of the few if not last surviving people to actually be taught by both Crowley & Spare.

In America there have been two separate versions published as The Law Is For All, originally as edited by Crowley’s former secretary Israel Regardie (the man who probably saved the Golden Dawn from oblivion) and first released by Llewellyn in 1975 (with the Stele mistakenly photographically reversed upon the cover!). A later edition began in an even earlier form edited by Crowley’s old friend and literary executor Louis Wilkinson, which was revised and completed by Hymenaeus Beta (the present Outer Head of Order of the Caliphate dispensation of the Ordo Templi Orientis) and published by New Falcon Press in 1996 (with a photo of the original Stele itself on the cover, easily recognizable by the two big holes the Cairo museum made when they nailed it to the damn wall!).

Lastly, there is the Commentaries of AL, edited by the late Marcelo Ramos Motta (O.H.O. of the Brazilian Sociedade O.T.O.) with his own usually somewhat loony yet occasionally quite cogent thoughts interpolated, and published by Weiser in 1976. It must be admitted that he had some serious paranoia about the (occult) Black Brothers and a major bug up his butt about transvestites, but the poor man was raised in a Catholic country… and please also note that Crowley originally included extensive quotations from other authors who are generally omitted from all these versions, including A.S. Eddington, Bertrand Russell and Aldous Huxley.

The fact that I mention these three genially dueling O.H.O.s of three schismatic O.T.O.s (and there have in fact been several others, including the Swiss and various internet versions) shows both the vast diversity and inevitable contentiousness of the Thelemic movement; and we must recall that there were several splinter groups even before Crowley, since the Ordo Tempi Orientis began as an irregular Masonic group in the late 19th century (most might say very irregular!). Nevertheless, and not to get us bogged down in any form of heated controversy, the American O.T.O. still claims legal precedence and many of the copyrights. And I assume we must give their first Caliph Hymenaeus Alpha (the late Major Grady Louis McMurtry) due credit for his genuine dedication in working to revive the O.T.O. in America; and his successor Hymenaeus Beta kudos for his work in keeping much of the Crowley Canon in print and often in improved and scholarly editions, for organizing a show of Crowley’s paintings, and for considerably expanding the fraternal organization internationally.

If the extremely prolific Crowley is ever resurrected by cloning (he was cremated and his ashes lie under a tree in New Jersey, but DNA ejaculated onto his talismans still survives) his first words may well be “Where the hell are my royalties?” It is very easy to fall under the spell of reading through his system; Isaac Bonewitz (author of the important study Real Magic) called his books ‘cities within cities’, a vast network of interlocking volumes and aspects, a puzzle to be solved, a mystery explored, each qabalistic clue illuminating the next connection. Big Fun!

Among those who followed in Crowley’s footsteps perhaps the first was Frater Achad, who has described in his Liber 31 the discovery of the key word AL, often reversed as LA, which was accepted by Crowley as an essential revelation. After breaking with Crowley he produced several other works (primarily The Egyptian Revival, QBL or the Bride’s Reception, and The Anatomy of the Body of God) that explicate his own vision of the universe of the New Aeon and the English qabala, which involve a complete reversal of the order of the Paths on the Tree.

Achad also foreshadowed the coming Aeon of Maat, whose influence has been more clearly revealed by the recent works of Soror Nema, including the seminal Liber Pennae Praenumbra, Maat Magick, and The Way of Mystery. Other aspects of Achad’s work have been continued by the order Q.B.L.H., notably in Liber XIII. Further insights appear in the works of a later Crowleyan disciple, the famed rocket scientist Jack Parsons, and are collected in his Freedom Is A Two-Edged Sword.

I sometimes wonder if there is any surviving material analyzing Liber AL written by the mathematician Norman Mudd, another student and defender of Crowley, and unfortunately a suicide. Other aspects of the complex alphanumerical ciphers in Liber AL have been explored in such interesting works as T. Allen Greenfield‘s Secret Ciphers of the UFOs and The Key of the Abyss by Anthony Testa. There are many other brave attempts to work out a workable qabala of the English Alphabet both online and off, including the notable work of Linda Falorio,
Gerald del Campo, Jake Stratton-Kent, and many others.

Perhaps oddest of all is the so-called Book of Perfection and its later commentary Sunrise In The West, which purported to be a continuation of Liber AL, but has (to put it mildly) not found general acceptance; the author has recently been identified as James Beck, a.k.a. Jimmy Rocket. Judging by internal evidence he may also have written the privately published Riddle of Sebra, as by Prince Ariel. Actually rather interesting, although not canonical works... Llee Heflin’s The Island Dialogues are another early and creative heresy.

Many more contributions to the literature appear internationally in the various magazines of the diverse A.A. and O.T.O.-based and other far more heretical groups over the years, and in the anarchistic and creative and ephemeral ferment of the Internet. In addition, there appears to have been an important but now frustratingly unavailable issue of the journal Red Flame that contributed some new commentary and controversial thought. I’m sure I’ve missed a few things…

Coming from the Temple of Set, Don Webb has written a very interesting study titled Aleister Crowley: The Fire & The Force, and their original founder Michael Aquino has his own extensive although rather critical comment on the Book of the Law; while clearly emerging from a Setian perspective it also includes rather scholarly egyptological and other information and is well worth reading, even though the online version breaks off in mid-sentence about halfway through… like an unfinished Grail myth (have you noticed that many of them are incomplete?)

Aside from the pioneering works of Crowley, Achad, Parsons, Regardie, Culling, Grant, Motta et al (and Soror Nema’s writings on the Aeon of Maat), there have been several other valiant attempts at clearly explaining the magical system of the Aeon of Horus, including The Magick of Thelema by Lon Milo DuQuette, The Heretic’s Guide to Thelema by Gerald del Campo, The Magickal & Mystical System of the A.’.A.’. by James A. Eshelman (excellent!), and Abrahadabra by Rodney Orpheus. A recent new crop includes two studies by Dave Evans, and Initiation in the Aeon of the Child by J. Daniel Gunther, The Ending Of The Words by Oliver St. John & Sophie Di Jorio, and Aleister Crowley: A Modern Master by John Moore.

An interesting study of the historical antecedents of Thelema is Do What You Will: A History of Anti-morality by Arthurian scholar Geoffrey Ashe, recently re-issued and re-titled The Hellfire Clubs. There have also been at least two or three dozen biographies of Aleister Crowley, of rather varying quality. We should also pay tribute to Robert Anton Wilson, whose wide-ranging writings introduced thousands of readers to the Great Work of Thelema with wit and wisdom.

Last but not least I would like to salute The Scarlet Sisterhood Commentary on Liber AL for the thought-provoking use of language to explore and often illuminate the hidden dimensions of the text. Current on-line resources might include hermetic.com, which collects several of these commentaries, and all the issues of Silver Star, and many, many other sites. What would Crowley have thought of the Internet? Holy Cow, all that free porn…

What I am attempting to do here is to explain this work both as I have come to understand it and as a useful (?) introduction to the hypothetical layman. While I have obviously been influenced by many sources, what follows should probably be regarded entirely as my own thrice-damned opinion, illuminated mostly by personal practice, Crowley himself, and study of the world’s great psycho-spiritual traditions. I started this project years ago by writing my own version of a Comment from scratch, conceived as a response to each verse, and later re-consulted many of the other authorities mentioned above in hopes of incorporating the most important insights of Crowley as well as the recent studies of others. I’ll probably be revising and expanding this for the rest of my life, and I invite suggestions and (dare I say?) debate…

In general I am not particularly interested in extensively discussing all this in the customary but all too often obsessively numerological terms, although there have been multiple proposed interpretations of New Aeon English Alphabets, which their various vociferous proponents can well explain for themselves. Yet some numbers will inevitably come up, as both qabalistic Gematria and the hallowed cosmogram of the Tree of Life & Death remain essential interpretive elements of the code and the key to it all… and please note that Mr. Crowley employed the symbolism of the Tarot and both Hebrew and Greek alphabets in his calculations, some of which are perhaps a bit of a stretch... but the man was always known for pushing his luck.

To a new age of gods and monsters!
- Dr. Praetorius in The Bride Of Frankenstein




Part I: AL-MANDAL: the Infinite Circle of Nuit
(al-Mandal is the term for the ‘magical circle’ in Arabic sorcery,
as Mandala is in Sanskrit)


LIBER AL vel LEGIS: THE BOOK OF THE LAW
(sub figura CCXX as delivered by XCIII = 418 to DCLXVI)


Liber Legis is ‘Book of the Law’, and the AL was added some years later; CCXX is 220 in roman numerals, the count of verses in the transmission; and XCIII is 93, the key qabalistic number of the work along with 8, 11, 31, 56, 61, 80, 89, 111, 156, 418, 666, 718, ‘Pi’ and others; while DCLXVI is 666 (and all roman numerals under 1,000), the fabled Number of the Beast with which Crowley cheerfully self-identified, to the pants-wetting terror of all pseudo-Christian fundamentalists.

NU=56 and HaD=9, making 65 the number of Adonai or the HGA; there are 65 pages in the original manuscript (taking HAD=10 makes 66, sum total of the numbers from 1 to 11, ‘a number of the Great Work’). The various encoded numerological formulas and ciphers are seen as evidence of praeterhuman origins… and it is well worth noting that the manuscript clearly does appear to have been written in haste!

The three chapters seem to me a revelation of the nature of the new universe, then of the methods of magical evolution for the individual, then a series of often dire prophesies about modern times. They are spoken through the personas of Nuit, Hadit, and Ra-Hoor-Khuit via the voice of the entity Aiwass. Throughout the Book one might consider all appearances of the words ‘not’ or ‘none’ or ‘no’ as clues to the nature of Nuit, and ‘I’ or ‘all’ (AL) to the essence of Hadit or Pan or Abraxas…

Crowley remarks not otherwise cited are from his Old (and generally precise) or New (and often verbose) Comments and those of Motta are from his own odd revision thereof. While both of these gentlemen are often very amusing, I have generally tried to limit both my paraphrasing and their direct quotations to technical matters. Quotes from Frater Achad are from his Liber 31. Several notes are drawn from the individual Comments of the Scarlet Sisterhood and of Michael Aquino of the Temple of Set, and I quote many other sources.

My sincere thanks and appreciation (and acknowledgement of the copyrights of the O.T.O. and others) to them all… and I trust I have not exceeded the hazy concept of “fair usage”. I enjoy such quotations both as the making of a point with wit and style, and as a tribute to those who have inspired me. The Law is for All!



The First Chapter


1. Had! The manifestation of Nuit.

Had or Hadit is the seed of the Self, of the original and omnipresent consciousness, the secret star or individual point of view which is at the center of the circle; that circle or sphere is the external universe of space-time and matter, personified as the galactic goddess Nuit. Had is the archetypical primal core of the internal and experiential cosmos, creatively manifesting love and will into the void of chaotic potential which veils ultimate existence and/or nonexistence. As the unified focus of the infinite void and multiplicity of Nuit, he embodies and centers her being and is essentially her lover and child. Nuit is the macrocosm and Hadit the microcosm. The Sun is also a Star.

If we read this text in Tantric terms, Hadit is Shiva and Nuit is Kali or Shakti, or in Buddhism they may be Bodhicitta and Shunyata, in China Fu-Hsi and Nu-Kua. In Gnosticism, Nuit would be the fullness of the Pleroma and Hadit the manifested Creatura. In A.O. Spare’s system, I feel that Hadit is Zos and Nuit is Kia: the Hand and the Eye, or Lingam and Yoni, or vice versa. In Norse terms they are Odin and Wyrd, or Fire and Ice.

Hadit might be the proton and Nuit the electron on the atomic level. In terms of the Creation Myth of the Orphic Mysteries of Greece Nuit would be Nox (Night), Hadit is the primal genesis of Chaos, Heru-Ra-Ha is their firstborn Phanes (Light) or Eros (Love), and Maat is Gaia (the manifested World-Order).

Crowley states that Nuit is Matter, TAO, the Noun, Form, and the North, while Hadit is Motion, TEH, the Verb, Being, and the South; and that they may also be identified as Anu and Adad, a goddess and a god of the Sumerians.

Manifestation is a very important Word.


2.  The unveiling of the company of heaven.

The company of heaven is every soul, every star, every god or beast or tree, every element or form of being and becoming which is life. In the immortal words of the poet William Blake, “Everything that lives is holy, life delights in life.” ‘Company’ is perhaps the primary reason for the universe to have evolved multiple forms of life. The ‘unveiling’ or ‘revealing’ or ‘manifestation’ is the process of the expansion of consciousness and our unfolding innate divinity.

We might even recall Inanna’s Descent to the Underworld in Babylonian myth, when the goddess ventured down to the land of the dead to rescue her slain lover Tammuz and was forced to leave her seven articles of clothing and jewels at each of the seven gates, arriving naked to be slain and reborn herself. We are aethyrial spirits who materialize into physical incarnation.


3. Every man and every woman is a star.

Every man and every woman is unique, individual, perhaps ultimately equal in importance to every other, and expresses the art and essence of their life’s creation as a star radiates light. The Sumerian hieroglyph of a Star indicates a ‘deity’.

How many tyrannically established “religious traditions” have not systematically oppressed women and thus effectively denied equality and humanity to half the people on earth? As early as the third verse this Book supports feminism!


4. Every number is infinite; there is no difference.

Much study of Liber AL is based upon qabalistic manipulation of the various formulas of numerology, while in physics it is mathematics that is generally seen as the underlying schema of the universe. This phrase reminds us that much of this is still perfectly arbitrary, and that while every number possesses endless layers of validity and meaning, all may be ultimately meaningless outside the human context. The core concept of ‘no difference‘ is introduced, reminding us that everything is both true and false, neither true nor false, both meaningful and meaningless, and neither meaningful nor meaningless. This is the ‘not this, not that’ of Buddhist meditation, and the ‘neither-neither concept’ of A.O. Spare. It breaks the bonds and limits of conceptual thought.

"The stars are matter and we are matter but it doesn’t matter”, as Captain Beefheart once said.


5. Help me, o warrior lord of Thebes, in my unveiling before the Children of men!

The ‘warrior lord’ could be the falcon-headed god of war and virility Montu, a patron deity whom the scribe Ankh-af-na-Khonsu served in life, or perhaps Amoun, who was the patron god of Thebes. An alternate interpretation of this Warrior Lord is the scribe Crowley himself, who received this message and thus becomes the prophet of Horus, hawk-headed lord of the New Aeon. Thousand-gated Thebes was a city of ancient Egypt, now called Luxor.

The repeated theme of unveiling pictures the universe as a dancer, removing the layered veils that hinder perception to reveal endless new beauties and insights. The ‘children of men’ are all the generations and peoples of our earth.


6. Be thou Hadit, my secret centre, my heart & my tongue!

Hadit is the lover, complement, and core of the being of Nuit, through which she expresses her creation. Crowley identifies the secret centre as Life, the heart as Love, and the tongue as Language.

The formula of the Heart & Tongue derives from Egyptian ritual and myth, specifically when the name of the creator is Ptah: his heart was seen as the center of thought, truth, and perception, and linked to shining Ra; his tongue declared action brought into form, and was attributed to the magician-god Thoth, the Logos or Word. The heart is love, and the tongue expresses the word of will. Love & Will (Agape & Thelema, which in Greek qabala both total 93) are keys to the New Aeon. See also c.I, vs.32 & 53. The ‘secret centre’ may also be the mind or soul, or perhaps the sexual organs: Nuit as Kteis, Hadit as Phallos, the Cup and the Wand.

Another relevant triad of primal gods is that of Heka, the incarnation of Magick and Life itself, whose name implies the vivifying of forms or images, and who is one of several ‘first’ emanations of the Creator/Creation and the essential energizing power in all things. He is often accompanied by the deities Sia (who personifies perception, insight and intelligence, which were regarded by the Egyptians as seated in the heart) and Hu (the principle of ‘authoritative utterance’, the power of the True Word uttered by the tongue). The Word of Maat is IPSOS, ‘by that same mouth’.


7. Behold! it is revealed by Aiwass the minister of Hoor-paar-kraat.

Aiwass is the entity that delivered this message to the Beast known as Crowley, who later identified him with his own Holy Guardian Angel. As the minister of Hoor-paar-kraat, he is the Voice of the Silence. The name is also spelled Aiwaz, possibly the Arabic word for ‘Voice’, and variously numerated by Crowley at first as 78 (the number of cards in the Tarot deck and of the word MeZLA “the influence from Kether”), and later as the more familiar 93 (hebrew) and 418 (greek).

Hoor-paar-kraat is the ‘babe in the lotus’ or in the ‘egg of blue’ (the womb of space), the younger form of Horus, the Child who is the avatar, ruler or expression of the oncoming aeon, and in some sense an androgyne uniting and transcending the previous stages of the Mother and the Father. This ‘inner child’ is sometimes also identified with the individual’s Guardian Spirit or True Self. The idea of the Magical Child can also be expanded to the birth of any conception or sorcerous operation, the planted seed-wish of Crowley’s ‘bud-will’ or the subliminal sigils of A.O. Spare.

In Egyptian iconography child-gods are often depicted with a finger at their lips, which was later interpreted as a sign of silence. In the Thelemic or Golden Dawn systems one may employ the Sign of the Enterer (lunging forward with right foot and both arms extended at eye level) to project a charge of energy outward; followed by the Sign of Silence (stepping back, feet together, left index finger to lips, eyes shut) to withdraw or absorb energy, to center oneself, to banish any unwanted influences, to become invisible, or to end a ritual (for which the Signs of Opening or Closing the Veil are also very useful, and their performance is self-explanatory). These gestures of the Enterer or of Silence are means of assuming the aspect and powers of Horus or of Harpocrates (which are the greek forms of egyptian names).

This is Crowley’s own account of the experience of the transmission:

“I never looked round in the room at any time.

The Voice of Aiwass came apparently from over my left shoulder, from the furthest corner of the room. It seemed to echo itself in my physical heart in a very strange manner, hard to describe. I have noticed a similar phenomenon when I have been waiting for a message fraught with great hope or dread. The voice was passionately poured, as if Aiwass were alert about the time-limit. I wrote 65 pages of this present essay (at about my usual rate of composition) in about 10 1/2 hours as against the 3 hours of the 65 pages of the Book of the Law. I was pushed hard to keep the pace; the MS. shows it clearly enough.

The voice was of deep timbre, musical and expressive, its tones solemn, voluptuous, tender, fierce or aught else as suited the moods of the message. Not bass - perhaps a rich tenor or baritone.
The English was free of either native or foreign accent, perfectly pure of local or caste mannerisms, thus startling and even uncanny at first hearing.

I had a strong impression that the speaker was actually in the corner where he seemed to be, in a body of "fine matter," transparent as a veil of gauze, or a cloud of incense-smoke. He seemed to be a tall, dark man in his thirties, well-knit, active and strong, with the face of a savage king, and eyes veiled lest their gaze should destroy what they saw. The dress was not Arab; it suggested Assyria or Persia, but very vaguely. I took little note of it, for to me at that time Aiwass and an "angel" such as I had often seen in visions, a being purely astral.

I now incline to believe that Aiwass is not only the God or Demon or Devil once held holy in Sumer, and mine own Guardian Angel, but also a man as I am, insofar as He uses a human body to make His magical link with Mankind, whom He loves, and that He is thus an Ipsissimus, the Head of the A.'.A.'. Even I can do, in a much feebler way, this Work of being a God and a Beast, &c., &c., all at the same time, with equal fullness of life.

-Aleister Crowley, The Equinox of the Gods


8.  The Khabs is in the Khu, not the Khu in the Khabs.
9.  Worship then the Khabs, and behold my light shed over you!

A powerful magical formula expressed in Egyptian terms. Crowley defines Khabs as the Light or Star, and the Khu as ‘the magical entity of a man’ or ‘spirit’ or ‘Magical Image’. The Khabs is the essential cosmic spark of Hadit, the True Self. The Khu is all that which we formulate and recall and experience, our own body/mind/soul complex, the garment of personality and reality that we weave, our individual being and awareness. It is also the entire external world that we define by our apparent‘perceptions’ of an external ‘universe’. Michael Aquino notes that Khabs can be a hieroglyphic term for ‘stellar gods’ and Khu can also mean ‘fire or flame’, and thus explains this verse as “The stellar gods are within the flame; they do not create it.

We are then primarily to worship this Light within ourselves rather than any of the archetypical images of hypothetical deities outside, which may well be illusory or empty or transparent in the Buddhist perspective, although also simultaneously sublimely inspirational in the sense of Joseph Campbell’s Masks of God. By uniting ourselves with (and as) this inner Light of Hadit, we illuminate the outer Darkness that is the manifestation of Nuit. Shining this central life-giving Light upon the seeds of potential in the Darkness is the act of creation, and we should identify with the Truth of ourselves rather than any perhaps illusory (due to our preconceptions or childhood social programming) perceptions of the nature of so-called ‘reality’.

Note that the Khabs is the House of Hadit, while the Khu is the House of Nuit: the center and the sphere. In Castaneda’s system the Khabs might be seen as the Nagual and the Khu as the Tonal.

I really do try to resist directly quoting Crowley overmuch in this work, but I think this section of his New Comment is very important:

We are not to regard ourselves as base beings, without whose sphere is Light or "God". Our minds and bodies are veils of the Light within. The uninitiate is a "Dark Star", and the Great Work for him is to make his veils transparent by 'purifying' them. This 'purification' is really 'simplification'; it is not that the veil is dirty, but that the complexity of its folds makes it opaque. The Great Work therefore consists principally in the solution of complexes. Everything in itself is perfect, but when things are muddled, they become 'evil'…

The Doctrine is evidently of supreme importance, from its position as the first 'revelation' of Aiwass. This 'star' or 'Inmost Light' is the original, individual, eternal essence. The Khu is the magical garment which it weaves for itself, a 'form' for its Being Beyond Form, by use of which it can gain experience through self-consciousness... This Khu is the first veil, far subtler than mind or body, and truer; for its symbolic shape depends on the nature of its Star.

Why are we told that the Khabs is in the Khu, not the Khu in the Khabs? Did we then suppose the converse? I think that we are warned against the idea of a Pleroma, a flame of which we are Sparks, and to which we return when we 'attain'. That would indeed be to make the whole curse of separate existence ridiculous, a senseless and inexcusable folly. It would throw us back on the dilemma of Manichaeism. The idea of incarnations "perfecting" a thing originally perfect by definition is imbecile. The only sane solution is as given previously, to suppose that the Perfect enjoys experience of (apparent) Imperfection.”

“We are to pay attention to this Inmost Light; then comes the answering Light of Infinite Space. Note that the Light of Space is what men call Darkness; its nature is utterly incomprehensible to our uninitiated minds. It is the 'veils' mentioned previously in this comment that obstruct the relation between Nuit and Hadit.

We are not to worship the Khu, to fall in love with our Magical Image. To do this (we have all done it) is to forget our Truth. If we adore Form, it becomes opaque to Being, and may soon prove false to itself. The Khu in each of us includes the Cosmos as he knows it. To me, even another Khabs is only part of my Khu. Your own Khabs is your one sole Truth.”

From other sources:

We are told in Ch. I, V.9 to worship the Khabs (the house of Hadit) and behold my (Nuit's) light shed over you, because Khabs is the Central Point of Light, and we thus perform an act similar to that which made Creation manifest, rather than Not.
 - Frater Achad, Liber 31

“We are not human beings on a spiritual journey.
We are spiritual beings on a human journey.”

- Stephen Covey

‘”The soul is not in the body. The body is in the soul” is a near-quote of a statement in Aleister Crowley’s The Book of the Law: “The Khabs is in the Khu, not the Khu in the Khabs.” Khu means “spirit”, while Khabs means “star”.”
- Anarchy for the Masses: An Underground Guide to the Invisibles
by Patrick Neighly & Kereth Cowe-Spigai

“The universe is loved not for its own sake, but because the Self lives in it.
The gods are loved not for their own sake, but because the Self lives in it.
Creatures are loved not for their own sake, but because the Self lives in it.
Everything is loved not for its own sake, but because the Self lives in it.”
- Brihadaranyaka Upanishad


10. Let my servants be few & secret: they shall rule the many & the known.

Apparently both a call to the natural elitism of a self-chosen Thelemic aristocracy and a subtle reference to the very distinct possibility of a worldwide Illuminati conspiracy. Also a tacit recognition that truly awakened beings have always been very few and far between, and that magical secrecy does have many practical purposes. Survival, for one.

Grant insists that the constant usage of the term ‘secret‘ in AL is a codeword for the biochemical ‘secretions’ of the human physiology and their use in sexual and Tantric rites. Again, Nuit is the Yoni, Hadit the Lingam: Shakti and Shiva.


11. These are fools that men adore; both their Gods & their men are fools.

This points to the idiocy of finding one’s center in deities, authorities or institutions outside of oneself, whether political, academic, or religious. Most of the unnatural catastrophes in human history were caused by this kind of lemming-like behavior and its consequent avoidance of genuine personal responsibility. It may even refer to the ultimate philosophical impossibility of actually or definitively ‘knowing’ absolutely anything…

However, in esoteric terms we might also explore the complex symbolism of the sacred Fool of the tarot, and distinguish between the Fool and mere fools.


12. Come forth, o children, under the stars, & take your fill of love!
13. I am above you and in you. My ecstasy is in yours. My joy is to see your joy.

An impassioned call to pagan abandon, freedom, and love. Also an assertion that the divine awareness is not anything remotely separate but is present in all of us, taking Her pleasure in our bliss (rather than sitting remotely and grimly in judgment and dealing out eternal damnation for mere sexual escapades?). A beautiful conception of the purpose of life and an affirmation that we have entered the Space Age, and that our rituals should take place under the open sky of the starry night. We are the souls and brains and bodies that allow the universe to find joy and meaning through our mutual ecstatic experience or union or Samadhi. Magical rites have almost always been performed at night, when psychic sensitivity is at a peak, the children and mundanes are safely asleep, and the Earth shields the full force of solar radiation. The subtler energy of the stars empowers the initiate.

Also a reminder that many have found in Egypt the mythic remnants of a stellar cult, and that in the very earliest versions of afterlife beliefs souls did not descend to an underworld, but ascended as stars in the body of Nuit.


14. Above, the gemmed azure is
The naked splendour of Nuit;
She bends in ecstasy to kiss
The secret ardours of Hadit.
The winged globe, the starry blue,
Are mine, O Ankh-af-na-khonsu!

This verse is drawn from the ritual to Horus that Crowley wrote to prepare for the reception of Liber AL, and based upon the translation of the text upon the Stele of Revealing to which he was led in the Cairo Museum. It depicts the main entities of Thelemic cosmology: the arching body of the night-sky star-goddess Nuit and the winged solar globe of Hadit, above the enthroned presence of hawk-headed Ra-hoor-khuit. Before him stands the figure of the priest/scribe Ankh-af-na-khonsu for whom the stele was made, and who Crowley considered an alter ego or previous incarnation. This verse is an exquisite mantra for magical workings, perfectly expressing the cosmology of AL.

The name ‘Ankh-af-na-Khonsu‘ apparently means ‘He whose life is in Khonsu’ or ‘Life (or Energy) of the Moon’, and this leads us to a parenthetical consideration of the ancient lunar god Khonsu, another child god, at times a warrior and avenger or a magical healer and exorcist of demons, who is usually depicted in a form bearing the attributes and regalia of almost all of the other deities. His name means ‘traveler’, and he also often has the head of a falcon, or wears a crown combining the moon-crescent and sun-disk. A lunar priest for a solar god?


15. Now ye shall know that the chosen priest & apostle of infinite space is the prince-priest the Beast; and in his woman called the Scarlet Woman is all power given. They shall gather my children into their fold: they shall bring the glory of the stars into the hearts of men.

This introduces the officers or priesthood of the Thelemic Cultus, the celebrants of the rites: the male form is the Great Beast foreseen (in a mushroom-induced experience) by St. John in the biblical Book of Revelation, and who might better be understood as the wild goat-god Pan (whose name means ‘All’) or perhaps the red Set or Bes of Egypt (and we will happily leave Satan in some other obsolete mythological category). The female avatar is the Scarlet Woman, the Woman Clothed In The Sun, who is also typically vilified in Revelation, but more properly seen as the incarnation of the Goddess, the Tantric dakini or suvasini, or the Priestess of the Silver Star.

In The Vision & The Voice they are named as Chaos and Babalon (whose number is 156). The Great Beast is also called TO MEGA THERION, which totals 666 by isopsephy (greek qabala), and is one of Crowley’s magical names and childhood role models. She is also BABALON HE MEGELE (Babalon the Great). Revelation states that 666 is ‘the number of a man’. Joel Love recently pointed out to me that the hebrew spelling of Scarlet Woman would be ShNI AShE, which also adds up to 666 (the same spelling could also mean ‘Two Women’ or ‘Other Woman’). 666 is a very complex number in mathematics, and also the sum of all numbers on the roulette wheel… the fear of the number 666 is Hexakosioihexekontahexaphobia.

According to Wikipedia (which is often surprisingly good on occult topics!):

666 is the natural number following 665 and preceding 667. It is also an abundant number. It is the sum of the first 36 natural numbers (i.e. 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 34 + 35 + 36 = 666), and thus a triangular number. Since 36 is both square and triangular, 666 is the sixth number of the form n2(n2 + 1) / 2 (sequence A037270 in OEIS) and the eighth number of the form n(n + 1)(n2 + n + 2) / 8 (doubly triangular numbers, A002817). The number of prime numbers up to 666 is 121, the square of the number of prime numbers up to 36. 666 is the 60th 12-factored number; 60 is the first 12-factored number. 666=(36) − (26) + 1; 6=(32) − (22) + 1; 66=(34) − (24) + 1. 666 is the sum of the squares of the first seven prime numbers (i.e. 22 + 32 + 52 + 72 + 112 + 132 + 172 = 666). The harmonic mean of the decimal digits of 666 is (trivially - all repdigit natural numbers have this property) an integer: 3/(1/6 + 1/6 + 1/6) = 6, making 666 the 54th number with this property. In base 10, 666 is a palindromic number, a repdigit and a Smith number. A prime reciprocal magic square based on 1/149 in base 10 has a magic total of 666.The Roman numeral representation of the number 666 (DCLXVI) uses once each the Roman numeral symbols with values under 1,000, occurring in descending order of their respective values (D = 500, C = 100, L = 50, X = 10, V = 5, I = 1). 666 is a member of the Indices of prime Padovan sequence, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 14, 19, 30, 37, 84, 128, 469, 666, 1262, 1573, 2003, 2210, ...”

The epithet ‘scarlet‘ refers to the sacred womb-blood of the lunar cycle, for the magicks of the new aeon are said to be largely sexual in nature. Note the emphasis that the arcane power is always to be found in the Woman, the Shakti, Shekinah, Sophia, or wisdom-principle of cosmic energy. There is a Hindu saying that ‘Shiva without Shakti is shava’, or ‘God without Goddess is a corpse’. In Egypt Horus and Hathor celebrated a yearly sacred marriage, when her statue visited his temple in a holy procession and riotous festival. These dramatic roles are evocative forms that human beings may use to incarnate the very gods themselves.

I sometimes interpret them in Jungian terms: the Scarlet Woman as the Anima, the Beast as the Shadow, and their Child as the Self. Another perspective might see them as the Soul, Spirit and Flesh, or in alchemy as Sulfur, Mercury and Salt. It is said that they will gather a community of the newly awakened together, and draw the cosmic influences of the constellations into them, perhaps implying astrological or stellar or planetary forms of magick. Crowley, typically egocentric, came to believe that all these prophecies applied to him (and his current lovers) personally; while some clearly may, I consider them to provide a far more universal formula for ritual dramas. We can all wear these masks.


16. For he is ever a sun, and she a moon. But to him is the winged secret flame, and to her the stooping starlight.

This would appear to express the conventional solar man/lunar woman polarity of western esotericism and alchemy, and following Grant to assign the activation of the Kundalini energy to the priest, and the exudation of the Tantric kalas to the priestess.

Yet I think that sometimes they switch: She is the Woman clothed with the Sun, and Ankh-f-n-Khonsu is the Life of the Moon. Reversal, of course, is a major formula, and often a gateway to both the Aeon of Maat (time running backwards) and the Nightside of the Tree. It is good to remember that there are many cultures (Norse, Japanese, Egyptian) with strong male/moon and female/sun affinities. There is a great deal of fire in Babalon, Sekhmet, Freya, and all the solar/leonine goddesses. Role-reversal rules, there are absolutely no absolutes.... experiment! The sun gives direct light, while that of the moon is reflected or mirrored. The sun is electric, the moon magnetic.

Moon/Sun conjunctions or eclipses always seem like the hieros-gamos or sacred marriage to me; and as far as the Knowledge & Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel goes, the path of Samekh links Yesod and Tiphareth, the wedding of moon and sun, the unconscious and superconscious minds. Art, Alchemy, or the Angel of Time would all be names of the tarot trump concerned; the name Temperance of course refers to the alchemical process of tempering iron into steel by heating it in fire/sun and cooling in water/moon.

Note that Crowley also thought male stars or souls were formed from the center outwards and female stars from the circumference inwards, possibly implying a somewhat sexist belief that men expand from a core of self while women make up their own personalities from their surrounding influences. My own corollary to this is the notion that men’s thoughts may tend to run in straight lines and sharp angles, and women’s thoughts in curves and parabolas.

Crowley also states:

“In II, 16, we find that HAD is to be taken as 11 (see II, 16, comment). Then Hadit = 421, Nuit = 466.
421 - 3 (the moon) = 418
466 + 200 (sun) = 666
These are the two great numbers of the Qabalistic system that enabled me to interpret the signs leading to this revelation.”


17. But ye are not so chosen.

The uninitiated person is not yet fully awakened to the aeonic energy. The word ‘initiate’ means ‘to begin’. Being ‘not’ or Nuit may imply the crossing of the Abyss.

Motta says “The word 'ye' is usually employed in the verses as a cypher for The Beast and The Scarlet Woman - Yod + He.” A very clever thought.

This may also imply that Aleister Crowley is still The Beast, and that the legions of lunatics who have claimed to be his heir or reincarnation are not! His biographer Israel Regardie once considered compiling a book to be titled Liber Nuts: Letters From People Who Think They Are Aleister Crowley.
I am very sad that it was never published.


18. Burn upon their brows, o splendrous serpent!
19. O azure-lidded woman, bend upon them!

Invokes Hadit (as the Egyptian uraeus-serpent of royal and magical power or the Tantric Fire Snake of Kundalini, arising to open the third eye or Ajna-chakra, then going beyond) and Nuit (as the omnipresent mystery of the unfolding universe, or the thousand-petalled lotus of the crown chakra called Sahasrara) to activate the psychic centers of the human microcosm.

In the famous mantra OM MANI PADME HUM (Hail! The Jewel in the Lotus!) Hadit is the Jewel and Nuit the Lotus, also corresponding to the Dorje or thunderbolt-scepter and the Bell or skull-cup of Tantric practice, or to the Lance and Grail of our western mysteries.

This verse seems to be a formula of consecration. In personal practice I speak these two verses when lighting my candles and incense and filling my cup respectively. Note that Horus transmitted Liber AL at noon (also sacred to Pan), while the rites of Nuit are always to take place in the dark of night.


20. The key of the rituals is in the secret word which I have given unto him.

Keys are very old symbols of opening and authority, especially those of temples.
Crowley produced any number of impressive words of power, which may be studied in his writings. I suspect that the word referred to here may be the secret name of each individual’s Holy Guardian Angel, or perhaps simply ABRAHADABRA, the Word of the Aeon (see c.III, v.1). There was another mysterious Word of the Aeon given to Crowley in the 27th Aethyr of The Vision & the Voice: MAKHASHANAH. Both have eleven letters and both total 418. But in hebrew this word is spelled with eight letters: Mem/40, Aleph/1, Kaph/20, Aleph/1, Shin/300, Aleph/1, Nun/50, He/5 (and remember that hebrew would actually be written from right to left). This was very significant for numerological reasons, but the point is that Crowley apparently and unexpectedly heard the word for the first time with no notion of its qabalistic complexity. This is a good example of how such codes are keys in his more inspired or transmitted visionary works. His Angel is giving him clues. The numbers and tarot attributions and mantras that make up these words are magical formulas to be explored and given life.


21. With the God & the Adorer I am nothing: they do not see me. They are as upon the earth; I am Heaven, and there is no other God than me, and my lord Hadit.

Nuit is ultimately beyond any normal human conception.
Also, most of the formal devotions of conventional religions have essentially become mundane and bordering on useless, because they are strictly mediated by external symbols, formalized and often censored texts, and well-paid priesthoods. The reunitings of Nuit and Hadit, of the inmost self with the otherness beyond, are thus a higher form of yoga or union.

Less esoterically, Nuit is simply the physical universe, only perceived by the consciousness of Hadit. All that we seem to experience or think we know is filtered through our perhaps unreliable senses and the activity of our minds. Nuit is objective, Hadit subjective; or Nuit is potential, Hadit actual.


22. Now, therefore, I am known to ye by my name Nuit, and to him by a secret name which I will give him when at last he knoweth me. Since I am Infinite Space, and the Infinite Stars thereof, do ye also thus. Bind nothing! Let there be no difference made among you between any one thing & any other thing; for thereby there cometh hurt.
23. But whoso availeth in this, let him be the chief of all!

Again refers to the power of the secret names to be discovered by each individual, and with the key formula of ‘Infinite Space, Infinite Stars’ that identifies Nuit with the great goddess ISIS. The promised secret name on the goddess was revealed during Crowley’s Enochian visionary experiments in the Sahara desert as Our Lady Babalon, who with Lord Chaos are avatars or forms of Nu & Had in The Vision & the Voice. Crowley also received the name OLUN, who shares the numeration of 156 with BABALON. Other Words totaling 156 are KAOS (as 20+70+6+60), ALONE, QUIM, & PUNK (rock). Chaos Magick has become one of the most vital strands of occultism active today.

Continues to emphasize the word of ‘no difference’, the level of yogic attainment and non-attachment where apparent duality can no longer affect the equilibrium, and is perceived simply as the joyful dance or play of Maya or Shakti. ‘Bind nothing’ is also an excellent exhortation to absolutely avoid imposing limitations, obsessions, habits, preconceptions, rigidity or possessiveness of any kind upon yourself or on others. The ‘chief of all’ is one who has mastered their Self, or been mastered by it: the enlightened sage. For ‘all’ read AL, throughout the book.


24. I am Nuit, and my word is six and fifty.
25. Divide, add, multiply, and understand.

More qabalistic conundrums. NU would be Nun/50 and Vau/6, which reversed as UN perhaps reveals a key to the negation of things. These two letters are ascribed to Scorpio and Taurus, and the scorpion and bull are central to Mithraic iconography, which makes much use of zodiacal imagery. The vulture goddess MAUT totals 56.

Crowley suggests that this means dividing 6/50 = 0.12, with zero as Nuit the circumference, the point as Hadit the center, one as Ra-Hoor-khuit, and two human consciousness or Thoth, the breath of life (I might ignore the decimal point in favor of simply 012: Nuit as zero the void, Hadit the center as one, and the Twins as two). Adding 50+6 = 56 or NU, then 5+6 = 11, the number declared by Nuit as her own and claimed by Crowley as the number of Magick (the One Beyond Ten, outside the Tree of Life). Abrahadabra has eleven letters. Multiplying 50x6 = 300, the number of the Hebrew letter Shin assigned to Fire or Pluto and the Aeon trump, which had been previously titled the Last Judgment or the Angel (or in Etteilla’s early revision of the Tarot deck, as Chaos, which as I mentioned above is now a well-known and creative magical movement). Aquino believes the Word of Nuit is ‘Inertia.’


26. Then saith the prophet and slave of the beauteous one: Who am I, and what shall be the sign? So she answered him, bending down, a lambent flame of blue, all-touching, all penetrant, her lovely hands upon the black earth, & her lithe body arched for love, and her soft feet not hurting the little flowers: Thou knowest! And the sign shall be my ecstasy, the consciousness of the continuity of existence, (the unfragmentary non-atomic fact of my universality) the omnipresence of my body.

This expresses the nature and purpose of the universe as ecstasy, and affirms that there is ultimately no real division between its countless beings and elements. Greek philosophy, the various traditions of alchemy, and most religions have regarded all things as variant manifestations and permutations of a single primordial substance, The One. The land of Khem is an ancient name of Egypt, meaning ‘black earth’, referring to the fertile soil bordering the Nile. In the seasonal course of the annual flooding of the Nile various waves of color from mineral deposits passed down the river, which have been compared to the changes in color in the alchemical process of perfecting the Philosopher’s Stone. Much of this sacred science originated in Egypt, hence Al-Khem or alchemy.

Liber Pennae Praenumbra
states: “The nature of true Alchemy is that it changes not alone the substance of the Work, but also changes thence the Alchemist.

There is also an implied promise that consciousness is immortal. For ‘continuous’, perhaps consider the quantum continuum. My personal theory is that in terms of modern physics light or energy sometimes appears as a particle (Hadit) and sometimes as a wave (Nuit). The word ‘flowers’ might refer to the chakras.

Originally, the last part of this verse was dictated as ‘the unfragmentary non-atomic fact of my universality’; considering this to be incomprehensible, Crowley asked for clarification and was told ‘Write this in whiter words’ and ‘But go forth on’; he later replaced it with ‘the omnipresence of my body.’


27. Then the priest answered & said unto the Queen of Space, kissing her lovely brows, and the dew of her light bathing his whole body in a sweet-smelling perfume of sweat: O Nuit, continuous one of Heaven, let it ever be thus; that men speak not of the as One but as None; and let them speak not of thee at all, since thou art continuous!

Spiritual love is expressed in physical or Tantric terms, and the ancient symbolic language of perfumes, flowers, essences, secretions and kalas reflects a deep physiological gnosis. Throughout history magico-religious rites have employed incense and perfumes, often dedicated to specific entities, as the sign of an invisible presence. The sense of smell is one of the deepest keys to the re-creation of memory and altered states.

Also reflects in words like Not and None the core secret of eastern meditation: that emptiness, transparence, the infinite diamond void, always underlies, permeates, and is the ultimate ground of existence. The suggestive term ‘continuous‘ again implies the stellar continuum. As Albert Einstein said, "Once you can accept the universe as matter expanding into nothing that is something, wearing stripes with plaid comes easy."

Crowley’s New Comment includes many long discourses on psychology, philosophy, mathematics, chemistry and physics, drawing upon Einstein and Eddington, Freud and Jung. Passing on in 1947, I doubt that he made it too far into quantum theory, but he was clearly aware that the rapidly accelerating science of the future was somehow shining forth in this magical revelation. And oddly enough, he was in school at Cambridge when the electron was discovered or defined there.

Not speaking at all is the invincible formula of Hoor-par-kraat or Harpocrates, the invisible Lord of Silence. The apparent disdain for One as an obsession may well reflect the tragically bloodstained and fanatical history of the obsolete monotheisms sometimes termed the Black Dharmas.


28. None, breathed the light, faint & faery, of the stars, and two.
29. For I am divided for love's sake, for the chance of union.

Again, 0 = 2. Taoism in Action. These two are Yin & Yang, as the motive of being is bliss: separation for the sake of fusion, dazzling combinations of endless activity and love played out on myriad unfolding levels. The Creation of the World is a primordial Change from nonexistence into incarnation, where cosmic romance with ‘the 10,000 things’ as an adventure becomes the purpose of existence. Breath is life, pranayama is yoga, and darkness becomes filled with light. ‘faery’ is perhaps a nod to the heritage of Celtic culture; or perhaps misheard for ‘fiery’?

Here are three verses from the Scarlet Sisterhood Commentary:

“The One that is Nuit, the Whole, can not be accurately described as thus. The concept of One implies something that is not-One perceiving it. Nuit is more than one. Yet she is without division. So perfect, so whole, so unified in her Self is Nu, that she is none, meaning without parts, not parts lacking. But to speak so of her is to divide from her, and such is impossible. Thus Nu is not Nu, none.
The perception of division, which is impossible, is necessary to give definition to union. Thus can the non-divided be united.
Since division is a veil, a mask, it has no power to cause pain, which also is as a mask, but exists to heighten the ecstasy of union.”

Michael Aquino writes: 

“Nuit validates the concept that she is all-inclusive, hence cannot be distinguished from any other thing known to her… Yet the objective universe is not a homogenous whole; it is everywhere separated into complementary parts: +/- magnetic fields, matter/antimatter, mass/energy, light/darkness, heat/cold, etc. It is the interaction of these parts that engenders the phenomena of time and mathematics.”

A.O. Spare says,

"Self-pleasure by infinite unities and equal separations, to retain separateness.”

Frater Achad writes in Liber 31:

“I think the idea we should try to formulate, is very much that of the Qabalists, though the real meaning is, I am convinced, a matter of experience. First was Nothing, and this may be called LA while it is considered as expanding into Limitless Space (Ain Soph) and becoming Limitless Light, perhaps. The Beginning of things was caused by a simple change of conception, as it were a "looking inwards" instead of outwards, and a corresponding change from LA to AL. I think the difference in the way the English and Hebrew Alphabets are written, is a good symbol of this, the direction is different, so that the two letters might stand for either LA or AL according to the manner in which we look upon them. The great value of this Word lies in the fact that the self-same symbol contains the ideas of Nothing and Something, without any change in itself, and this seems to be the one Symbol that gets over the difficult transition from NOT to ONE. Of course it was not even a Word in the beginning, but the Silent Breath, Expansion and Contraction, and the true theory of the Universe is that it was created by the First Breath of the Tao, or Nuit. We find this confirmed in Liber Legis Ch. 1 Verse 28. "None, breathed the light, faint and faery, of the stars, and two."


30. This is the creation of the world, that the pain of division is as nothing, and the joy of dissolution all.

The ‘pain of division’ is the birth pang of the Universe, and also the condition of humanity. Yet this verse joyously dismisses the Buddhist obsession with sorrow and illusion, while perhaps retaining the concept of Nirvana (often conceived of as an ‘ocean of bliss’ or ‘the shoreless sea’, though the original meaning was ‘cessation’). Our universe is a vast playground; as Heraclitus said,

“The Aeon is a Child at play.”



31. For these fools of men and their woes care not thou at all! They feel little; what is, is balanced by weak joys; but ye are my chosen ones.

The limited roles and daily dramas of common life pale before the quest for ultimate answers, and every true individual must undertake this journey on no terms but their own. Also points out the pitfalls of second-hand emotion and blind belief, which seem to ensnare and obsess many of us so completely that we feel compelled to interfere with the lives of others, or live out our own lives vicariously on the screens of computers, televisions and films. It has often been said that “most people lead lives of quiet desperation”; I might well add to that the constant distractions of gossip, group-thought, the mindless barrage of the Media Spectacle, and habitual self-destruction by alcohol or other medicaments (whenever used to achieve numbness and addiction rather than creativity, metamorphosis or joy). Let’s face it: most people probably are doing the very best they can according to their rather dim lights, and just want a peaceful and undemanding life (and good luck with that!). However, there are also a lot of genuine idiots on this planet.

Balance or Equilibrium (Maat) is an extremely important concept… and practice! In general, many polarities must maintain an active ongoing equilibrium, or collapse.


32. Obey my prophet! follow out the ordeals of my knowledge! seek me only! Then the joys of my love will redeem ye from all pain. This is so: I swear it by the vault of my body; by my sacred heart and tongue; by all I can give, by all I desire of ye all.

Apparently identifies Crowley as the prophet, and warns of the inevitable ordeals which may lead to knowledge or gnosis, while promising transcendence of sorrow and pain. In general most magical initiations wind up including a corresponding ordeal, self-created or external, and in many cases the twin concepts seem inseparable and inevitable processes.

Aquino states: “Dissolution of the self into Nuit brings an end to all self-consciousness and thus from pain. The ultimate argument of Nuit is for suicide of the finite self in order to become part of the infinite whole.”

The formula of the ‘heart & tongue’ reappears. The vault of Her body is the arching Sky or the universal matrix of the curved time/space continuum. I recently found a magical word of Nuit in The One & The Many by the eminent Egyptologist Erik Hornung, who wrote: “But the sky is a number of things - cow, baldachin, water, woman - it is the goddess Nut and the Goddess Hathor…” Baldachin? This is variously defined as a richly embroidered brocade fabric of silk and gold or silver threads, a cloth canopy fixed or carried over an important person or a sacred object in procession, or an ornamental structure resembling a canopy used especially over an altar or tomb. The body of Nuit, the infinite night-sky, jeweled with stars…


33. Then the priest fell into a deep trance or swoon, & said unto the Queen of Heaven; Write unto us the ordeals; write unto us the rituals; write unto us the law!

The altered state of trance or gnostic consciousness is an essential prerequisite for the successful practice of magick, and there are countless techniques for achieving it, including the various physical, spiritual, psychological and entheogenic technologies of Magick and Yoga. As Crowley said:

“We place no reliance
On virgin or pigeon;
Our Method is Science,
Our Goal is Religion.”

"Oh, it's marvelous! We can do anything now that science has invented magick!"
                -Marge Simpson


34. But she said: the ordeals I write not: the rituals shall be half known and half concealed: the Law is for all.

Life is quite well known for presenting us all with ordeals or tests, the trick is to accept them as learning experiences and work through them, at which point ordeal becomes initiation. One should probably expect initiation to be somewhat stressful (and that is a considerable understatement). Rituals may be best drawn from one’s chosen cultural traditions or previous incarnations, but in the New Aeon must be adapted, expanded, and made one’s own: the best magick is that which you create yourself. The Law is termed universal, and acceptance of Thelema triggers inspiration and mutation. Individual change is Initiation, collective change is Evolution.


35. This that thou writest is the threefold book of Law.

Three chapters, three deities, three ecstasies; and hence titled The Book of the Law. This may be the ‘Sealed Book’ prophesied in Revelation.


36. My scribe Ankh-af-na-khonsu, the priest of the princes, shall not in one letter change this book; but lest there be folly, he shall comment thereupon by the wisdom of Ra-Hoor-Khu-it.

The three chapters of the Book of the Law are, if one truly accepts them, the program for a very remarkable series of transformative experiences. They contain far less dogma and accretion than most religious texts, which tend to be heavily edited as the centuries pass. This makes the insistence upon preserving the unchanged original quite logical. The reference to ‘wisdom’ links the work of comment to the qabalistic sphere of Chokmah and the accompanying grade of the Magus, and various other commentators upon AL were covered in my introduction.

William Blake said, “If the fool would persist in his folly he would become wise.”


37. Also the mantras and spells; the obeah and the wanga; the work of the wand and the work of the sword; these he shall learn and teach.

Mantras and spells are verbal and poetic formulas, repeated to concentrate the mind; the obeah and the wanga are drawn from Afro-Caribbean tradition, and perhaps refer to ecstatic ritual actions such as drumming and dance, although Crowley defines them simply as Act and Words. I rather doubt that Crowley studied much Vodou, but it is clearly very significant that so many terms from various cultures appear in this text. The shift to a Nu Aeon affects all world traditions, and every consciously willed act is a magical act. The 93 Current reconciles all teachings, a process seen in The Vision & The Voice, the series of Enochian scryings that continued his initiation and the transformation of the metaphysical or metaphorical cosmos.

More specifically, Obeah is largely a system of spirit communication, while Wanga are traditional magical ‘charm assemblages’ or gris-gris, talismanic or medicinal substances, often sealed in the bellies of protective statues in Africa, or in America in healing or cursing or attracting ‘hoodoo bags’.
The sword and wand (Solve et Coagula, Analysis & Synthesis) are the more masculine tools of the magician, perhaps indicating that the cup and disk are the work of the priestess?

Crowley in his Comment ever so modestly says:

“Why am not I to learn and teach the work of the Cup and of the Disk? Is it because they are the feminine weapons? Shall the Scarlet Woman attend to these? The Book does not say so; the passives are ignored. I feel the omission as a lack of balance, the only case of the kind in the Book. This makes me certain that there is a special meaning. This wand and sword may not be the wand and sword, or rather dagger, of the elemental weapons. The Wand may be that of the Fool, the sword that of Justice, whose letters are A & L; AL is the Key of the whole Book.

We may also take them as simple symbols, the one as that of Love, the other as that of War. But, looking back over sixteen years, what have I learnt and taught? Surely the work of the wand, the free use of the Will to create, and the way to give power to the Will. I have set it up and caused men to worship it, for its name is God-in-action. As to the work of the sword, I have fought, I have shorn shams asunder, I have anatomized my mind as no man has done since Gautama. Last, I have shown how pure analysis leads to the highest Trance, and unveils the absolute Truth.”

The Cup is the Holy Grail and also the Chalice of Abominations, while in our era the Pantacle or Globe of the Earth has evolved beyond the Coin to become the data disk, encoding huge amounts of information in the form of texts, numbers, images and music. The Sword of Thelema is paired with the Balance of Truth, while the Wand or Rod or Staff is the quintessential tool and symbol of the Magus.

There is a very old practice called bibliomancy, divination by opening a random page of a book and closing your eyes and pointing out a sentence for an oracle. For a long time the Bible was preferred, but Liber AL and the other Thelemic Holy Books, Joyce’s Finnegans Wake or R.A. Wilson’s Illuminatus! or whatever has meaning for you can work. This is just such an omen-quote that I randomly found, which turned out to be on the nature of the wand, from a favorite literary star of mine:

“As the World Tree stands, so stands its child, the sanctified stick. Shamans climb it. Maidens dance around it. Men use it for pointing. It points to thunder, to comets, to the migrating herds. Sometimes it points to you.
Once there was a man who carried a stick that he swirled in a stream until a hair clung to it. The direction in which the hair pointed led to satisfaction. But who deserved credit, the hair or the stick?
Stick is the magic penis. When waved, it sows sons and daughters. Stick is also lethal. It cracks a skull nicely.
Guns have been called “magic sticks,” but guns are only half magical: they take life but can’t create it.
If a stick is twirled under proper conditions, it makes fire. If rubbed against another stick, it makes fire. Once a stick is painted, however, it is assigned to other duties.
Sigmund Freud observed children rolling hoops with sticks. Freud made notes in his journal.
T.S. Eliot wrote:

Crossed staves in a field
Behaving as the wind behaves.

In a deck of cards, there are four suits: diamonds, spades, hearts and sticks. The card stick was both the rod of the peasant and the wand of the magi. Whip the donkey. Stir the moon.
Like a sword, or a phallus, it feels quite good to hold a stick in your hands. If held correctly, with maximum consciousness (and that is difficult to do), the stick may suddenly flower.
There is a sense in which a painted stick is a stick in bloom. This stick points to the hidden face of God. Sometimes it points to you.”

- Tom Robbins, skinny legs and all


38. He must teach; but he may make severe the ordeals.

There is a duty to spread the word, but lessons must ultimately be learned by the personal struggle of the individual student, and one thrust into the role of teacher has the right to test their students as well as the obligation to share their experiences. Conversely, students have an equal right to test the honesty of their teachers. While cooperation is needed within organizations, all authority in the New Aeon ultimately rests within the individual. However, it is still the people who do the Work who earn the rewards…


39. The word of the Law is Θελημα.

Thelema (written in Greek letters in the original manuscript) or ‘Will’ is the key word and core principle of the magick of this system. With its other half Agape or ‘Love’ it shares the signal numeration 93, hence the term 93 Current. According to Robert Anton Wilson its linguistic roots lie in words meaning ‘sorcery or spells’. The discovery of the True Will and the Great Work of carrying it out are the goals of the Thelemic magician. Beyond mere focus or one-pointedness, the True Will is defined as the full expression of the primal essence of your own unique nature, of ‘being who you are’.

An A.U. is the scientific term for an astronomical unit, the average or mean distance between the Earth and the Sun: 93 million miles. ‘Au’ is also the symbol for solar Gold in the periodic table of elements, from the Latin ‘Aurum’.

See also Rabelais's Gargantua & Pantagruel for details of his idea of an Abbey of Thelema and its way of life, whose only law was ‘Fay ce que vouldras’, or ‘Do What Thou Wilt’. In the 1700s the same phrase was carved by the notorious rake Sir Francis Dashwood over the door of Medmenham Abbey as the motto of the libertine Hellfire Club. Benjamin Franklin and Voltaire were occasional visitors.


40. Who calls us Thelemites will do no wrong, if he look but close into the word. For there are therein Three Grades, the Hermit, and the Lover, and the man of Earth. Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

The Hermit is solitary in his concentration, and might imply the formula of the ascetic or yogi. The Lover implies connections with all life, and perhaps the varied methods of sexual magick, or the devotion of bhakti-yoga (’yoga’ means ‘union’). The Man of Earth takes action in the mundane or physical world, but it would be a mistake to consider this in any way a ‘lower’ form of practice; all three are equally valid modes of being, and one’s work or career in the material world should be as clear an expression of the True Will as any other aspect of life. The rejection of the physical realm as evil or flawed or unclean is a sad delusion of monotheist superstitions such as christianity or new ageism, and has no place in genuine and natural paganisms such as Thelema.

The Scarlet Sisterhood Commentary quite lucidly says: “The Hermit changes himself, the Lover changes another, and the man of Earth changes his World.”

Crowley interprets these Thelemic grades in terms of the Tarot Atus:
THE is the Hermit, numbered IX,
LE is the Lovers and VI,
MA is the Tower and XVI: and 9+6+16 = 31, one-third of 93.

He also states that:

"It is explained in Liber 418 that: "The man of earth is the adherent. The lover giveth his life unto the work among men. The hermit goeth solitary, and giveth only of his light unto men. Thus we have in the Order, the Mystic, the Magician, and the Devotee. These correspond closely to the Nuit - Hadit - Ra-Hoor-Khuit Triad.”

I might also suggest another view: the Man of Earth I ascribe to the lower four spheres of the Tree of Life (Malkuth, Yesod, Hod and Netzach), which are considered the basic elemental workings of the First Order or Golden Dawn.

Then there is the Veil of Paroketh, between the lower four spheres and the attainment of the Knowledge & Conversation of the Holy Guardian Spirit.

The Lover grade I see as the triangle of Tiphareth, Geburah and Chesed or the King, Warrior and Priest. These form the downward-pointing red triangle that is the symbol of Horus, and are the Second Order of the Rosy Cross.

Between the lower seven spheres and the three highest spheres lies the non-sphere of Daath, the gateway of forbidden Knowledge guarded by the Veil of the Abyss.

I regard the Hermit grade as the Supernals, Binah, Chokmah and Kether. These final or primal three spheres are considered to be the realm of the Third Order or Silver Star. Above this paradoxical Abyss all things exist only as identical with their own opposites: in Binah, Sorrow is Joy; in Chokmah, Truth is Falsehood; in Kether, Self is Not-Self.

Beyond this are the Triple Veils of the Beyond, of negative existence: Ain, Ain Soph, Ain Soph Aur, sometimes interpreted as Nothingness, Without Form, and the Limitless Light. The Ain is Nuit, is later reversed as Nia, and will be discussed later.

Seeing the Tree of Life as a Ladder of Lights is essentially a fallacy, and it should probably be seen as one sphere ringed like an onion; or even better as one atomic sphere vibrating different musical notes at 11 levels of frequency. The Tree is Hadit.

‘Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law!‘ is the credo and essence of all of Crowley’s teaching. This is not merely a call to hedonism, but more like a magical version of Jung’s process of Individuation: the purpose of human existence is to discover one’s own True Self, one’s Buddha-Nature, to achieve wholeness and fulfill one’s destiny and purpose, ‘to become who we really are’. It is to discover your primal obsession, to reify the inherent dream. Like Nietzsche, Reich and many modern psychologists Crowley deeply believed that all human beings are born truly free, but are then immorally programmed with the rigid (and stupid) rules of society and culture. This inevitably leads us to much of the unhappiness in the world, and it is only by a determined and revolutionary process of conscious deconditioning and discarding the ego-masks of the socialized persona that the genuine Self is finally allowed to emerge. To discover this True Will is to find the real purpose at the core of one’s being, and to work it out fully in life is the only possible meaning for any individual experience, the existential and heroic quest for meaning.

A.O. Spare said: “Do as you please, to whom the pleasing is the law.

Oscar Wilde said: "To become a work of art is the object of living."


41. The word of Sin is Restriction. O man! refuse not thy wife, if she will! O lover, if thou wilt, depart! There is no bond that can unite the divided but love: all else is a curse. Accursed! Accursed be it to the aeons! Hell.

Apparently the only sin in a completely Thelemic society would be to deny or transgress against another’s Will, and ideally in such a sublime cosmos stars in their harmonious orbits will never disastrously conflict. In practice there may still be some bugs in the system, as not everyone is perfected in their ongoing evolution… and worlds do indeed collide.

Born at the end of the Victorian era when sexual hypocrisy was at a phenomenally high level, with prostitution rampant and divorce nearly impossible, Crowley had a great lifelong appreciation of the importance of freedom and a matching aversion to external authority. No doubt we would like to consider ourselves in the 21st century as much more personally liberated and socially advanced, but the struggle still continues: much of America still maintains bizarrely puritan obsessions which corrupt our culture and politics to this day. The vital separation of church and state envisioned by our founding fathers and forgotten mothers is continually threatened; we should recall that they sought to escape many centuries of European religious conflict by creating a utopia on a new continent, and if we contemplate dictatorships of orthodoxy such as Muslim Afghanistan and Iran or fascist North Korea and Burma or semi-communist China today we might see why. Frankly, most of this planet remains completely screwed… and many of us are simply starving to death.

Anton Szandor LaVey’s magical formula was “Indulgence instead of Abstinence.”
Yet another bald-headed mage without a day job, declaring a new age…


42. Let it be that state of manyhood bound and loathing. So with thy all; thou hast no right but to do thy will.

The ‘state of manyhood bound and loathing‘ could refer to the chaotic demon of dispersion Choronzon (333) who guards the non-sphere of Daath or Knowledge at the pylon of the gate of the Abyss, and doubled with SHuGaL (333) equals the Beast as 666 established in equilibrium. Or even more likely, it points to society and/or schizophrenia. ‘thy all’ confronts ‘the many’.


43. Do that, and no other shall say nay.

‘No right but to do thy will’ is a rather high moral principle; it implies that everyone has the responsibility and obligation and potential to perfect their own life alone, and no right whatsoever to interfere with anyone else’s decisions or judgment. This may or may not actually be possible, and remains unlikely, but might lead to Utopia.


44. For pure will, unassuaged of purpose, delivered from the lust of result, is every way perfect.

Pure Will would thus appear to be a very high state indeed, corresponding to the Tantric Svecchachara (“a way of life where one acts as one wishes and does what is right in one's own eyes”). One should never be a slave to obsession, but act as an artist with life as your work, expressing the essence of your true nature.
The warning against the ‘lust of result’ is a magical formula implying a certain ironic or enlightened detachment from one’s obsessions, as was deliberately cultivated by Spare’s method of concealing desires in sigilized form to elude the raging conflicts of the ego-consciousness. Much meditation throughout the eons has been devoted to non-attachment, with varied levels of success. Attachment, on the other hand, has a long history of inevitable sorrow, hence the solution of Buddhism.

As Crowley says:
“I recommend serious study of the word unassuaged which appears not very intelligible.”



45. The Perfect and the Perfect are one Perfect and not two; nay, are none!

Defines the equation of 0 = 2 as (+1) (-1) = 0; the positive and negative poles, the Yang and Yin that cancel each other out. One of the major keys to these mysteries.


46. Nothing is a secret key of this law. Sixty-one the Jews call it; I call it eight, eighty, four-hundred & eighteen.

More bloody math. Nothingness, the void, emptiness, is a key to understanding, or what underlies understanding: an emphasis perhaps more eastern than western. 61 is the Jewish qabalistic concept of AIN or nothingness: Aleph/1, Yod/10, Nun/50. Reversed it is NIA (see AL c.III, v.72). KALI also equals 61. Eight could be Cheth/8, the Atu of the Chariot of Horus; while eighty is Pe/80, corresponding to the Tower of Maat; both are keys to the Dual Aeon. 418 is, like 93, a core number of Thelema, corresponding to the magickal words Abrahadabra and Makhashanah among others. 418 is also the letter Cheth spelled in full: Cheth/8, Yod/10, Tau/400. In greek qabala PALLAS ATHENA = 418, as does HIEROGLYPH (‘sacred sign’) in English.

Frater Achad also numerates his other name Parzival as 8, 80 and 418:

“There is of course a very definite connection between Parzival and Abrahadabra, the Word of the Aeon, through 418. And it is said that Abrahadabra shall be His child and that strangely. And Parzival having Eight letters, and Initial value 80 and total numeration of 418 is therefore connected with this verse.”
“Now Parzival is 8.80.418, and as The Fool or Aleph is both Zero and One. 61 is the Word Ain = Nothing and equivalent to NOT. If 61 is one half and 1 (Aleph) the other, we get 62 which is twice 31 and LA: AL in which ALL (Note three letters LAL) disappear in the Final Mystery of Kether. Also we have considered the threefold aspect as 93, and this may have to do with AAA and LLL, Light, Life, Love and Liberty of His Law.”


47. But they have the half: unite by thine art so that all disappear.

Crowley, in my less than humble opinion, may not have completely solved this riddle. He takes 8+80+418 = 506, NU as ‘six and fifty’ in c.I, v.24. That works fine. Adding 506+61 = 567 = 27x21, not particularly helpful. He resorts to reversing it to 605+61 = 666. 1+2+…36 = 666, the sum total of the magical kamea or square of the Sun, also notorious as the Number of the Beast and the Devil’s area code, and SURaTh the spirit of the Sun, and SURT the Norse fire-giant… Okay as far as it goes I guess, but I believe a further solution must eventually be found.

“I am not of this world, nor of the next, nor of Paradise, nor of hell.
My Place is the Placeless, my trace is the Traceless;
'Tis Neither body or soul, for I belong to the soul of the Beloved.
I have put Duality away, I have seen that the two worlds are one...”
      - Jalal al-Din Rumi, The Diwan of Shams-i-Tabriz


48. My prophet is a fool with his one, one, one; are not they the Ox, and none by the Book?

The Book of Thoth is the Tarot; these are all aspects of the complex (or utterly simple) Atu of the Fool, whose numeration in the Tarot is 0 (zero or none) and Hebrew letter is Aleph/1, which means ‘Ox’ and equals 111 when spelled in full. He thus symbolizes and encompasses existence and nonexistence, all and naught, wisdom and folly, personifying paradox. Note that OX is the circle and cross which make up the Mark of the Beast, and also recall the Ordeal X in Chapter III.

Frater Achad discovered one of the major mysteries of this book with the word AL or ‘God’ (more usually transliterated EL from the Hebrew, as in ‘Elohim’ or at the end of angelic names like Raziel). Its reversal LA means ‘not’ or ‘naught’, thus giving us a dual formula: the positive pole of AL as God or All is Hadit, balancing LA as the negative Not or Naught or Night of Nuit (and Laylah, Arabic for Night as Nuit is the French for Night). Throughout this book, we must bear these aspects in mind wherever the words ‘all’ or ‘not’ may appear. While Aleph/1 means Ox, Lamed/30 means Ox-goad, a striking parallel; the total of 31 is of course one-third of 93. The prophet as fool might then indicate Achad, one of whose other magical names was Parsifal (=418), the Pure or Holy Fool of the Arthurian Quest for the Holy Grail. The letters A & L also resemble the compass & square of Masonic symbolism. It was important to Achad that AL/LA was a Name of God (Allah), that it seemed to be the sound of breathing in and out, and that written in English (left to right) or Hebrew (right to left) it is reversed, hence the Word of Double Power.


49. Abrogate are all rituals, all ordeals, all words and signs. Ra-Hoor-Khuit hath taken his seat in the East at the Equinox of the Gods; and let Asar be with Isa, who also are one. But they are not of me. Let Asar be the adorant, Isa the sufferer; Hoor in his secret name and splendour is the Lord initiating.

All previous systems of initiation are declared obsolete in the Aeon of Horus; the Equinox of the Gods was March 20th, 1904. There are echoes of the Golden Dawn equinox ceremony, where new officers took their places in the temple for the half-year to come; however, all of their practices are now to be superseded by the arcane rites of Thelema. Years later, Crowley used this rationale to declare himself the new leader of the Order and sole link to the authority of the Secret Chiefs; naturally this deeply endeared him to those who had previously considered themselves in charge.

Asar is Osiris, the god of the previous aeon of the Father, whose magical formula was Death & Rebirth. Asar is the adorant, the lover/brother of the goddess Isis; and is also the lord of the dead in the underworld, often portrayed as swathed in the wrappings of a mummy, which may point to the shamanic or tantric meditation of becoming a corpse, seen in the Tibetan graveyard Chod rites, adopted by the Golden Dawn as the image of the archetypical Rosicrucian Christian Rosenkreutz in the Vault or Tomb of the Adepts, and by Spare as the fulgurous trance of the Death Posture. Isis as the mourning widow searched for the scattered pieces of Osiris to reunite and reanimate them, so that she could give birth to the child Horus after magically recreating the missing phallus of her murdered sibling/husband. This is one of the major myth-cycles of ancient Egypt; cross-cultural parallels might include the similar dismemberment of Kali in India, where there are temples dedicated to each place where a piece of her body fell; or Innana’s descent to the underworld in Sumerian myth; or even the grieving Demeter’s search for her lost daughter Kore or Persephone in Greece and the Eleusinian Mysteries.

I (and many others) have often logically assumed that Isa was a form of the name Isis, but that is generally transliterated as Asi (Osiris, Isis, Horus and Harpocrates are all the Greek forms of Egyptian names). Crowley actually takes Isa as the Islamic (and Irish!) form of the name of the suffering Jesus, associating him with Asar and the previous Aeon of the Father and its formula of death and rebirth. Hoor or Horus is the initiator and transformer, the hierophant or psychopomp of this new age or Nu Aeon, when consciousness may be eclipsed but remains continuous, and the Osirian (or Judeo-Christian-Islamic) Age is overthrown and transcended.

Motta notes: “"Isa the sufferer". This expression needs no explanation if you have any acquaintance with the sado-masochistic nature of Christian mysticism, especially where Roman Catholicism predominates. Some people are happy only when they suffer. Let them be.”


50. There is a word to say about the Hierophantic task. Behold! there are three ordeals in one, and it may be given in three ways. The gross must pass through fire; let the fine be tried in intellect, and the lofty chosen ones in the highest. Thus ye have star & star, system & system; let not one know well the other!

The Hierophant is the guide of souls and high priest; his task is initiation, which Jung termed individuation, and the formula given recalls the alchemical process of the creation of the famous Stone of the Wise or Philosopher‘s Stone, which is closely paralleled and precipitated by the transformation of the alchemical adept himself. These three ordeals are physical, mental, and spiritual tests. The ‘gross’ refers to the base or primal matter of the Great Work which is reduced into decay and a formless chaotic state and purified by the Secret or Invisible Fire, then refined to become ever more subtle. As the ‘fine’ the alchemist’s own wisdom or intellect increases through this experience and by the understanding of the encoded texts that describe this operation. In the final ‘lofty’ stage one ultimately ascends to become an unveiled star in the body of Nuit: the gross is the physical, the fine is the mental, and the highest the spiritual body of the self-perfected human being.

Each star is a sun encircled by its own solar system, whose unfolding complexities can never be fully known by another. In terms of the three main alchemical stages the Gross would refer to the blackening and putrefactions of Nigredo, the Fine to the repeated purifications and refinement of Albedo, and the Lofty to Rubedo, when the final attainment and activation of the Philosopher’s Stone transforms lead into gold and mundane awareness into truly illuminated consciousness. These three stages also represent body, soul and spirit, or the black raven, white swan and red phoenix, or salt, mercury and sulfur. The chemical process parallels the psychological evolution of the alchemist herself. As for ‘star & star, system & system’: everything in its place.


51. There are four gates to one palace; the floor of that palace is of silver and gold; lapis lazuli & jasper are there; and all rare scents; jasmine & rose, and the emblems of death. Let him enter in turn or at once the four gates; let him stand on the floor of the palace. Will he not sink? Amn. Ho! warrior, if thy servant sink? But there are means and means. Be goodly therefore: dress ye all in fine apparel; eat rich foods and drink sweet wines and wines that foam! Also, take your fill and will of love as ye will, when, where and with whom ye will! But always unto me.

This is a ritual of initiation. The palace of the king may be the temple of the priest, and the four gates the four quarters of the world and the four elements of the magus (north, south, east, west or earth, fire, air, water or disk, wand, blade, cup). The black & white chessboard floor design of Masonic halls is now formed of the shimmering silver & gold of the lunar and solar currents. Entering the hall one is tested, to rise or fall, uniting with angel or with demon; it may make no final difference which.

Lapis lazuli and jasper are stones (Earth) of blue and of green ascribed by Crowley to Nuit and Hadit; jasmine and rose are scents (Heaven) ascribed to the Moon and to Venus (the Rose has a very complex series of symbolisms, and is in the West what the Lotus is to Egypt and the East). Lapis lazuli is especially interesting, a vivid blue with flecks of gold, traditionally seen as a symbol of the celestial firmament and used as protection from the evil eye. In Egypt the goddess Hathor is the Lady of Turquoise, and since ancient descriptions of substances are often variable, it has been suggested that this also refers to lapis lazuli. ‘Lapis’ is simply latin for ‘stone’: the Lapis Philosophorum is the Philosopher’s Stone of alchemy. I keep two pieces of lapis lazuli and jasper on my altar, and sometimes burn jasmine and rose as incenses. One last thought on lapis lazuli and jasper: in some ancient South American cultures the night-sky serpent with green quetzal feathers unites with the turquoise day-serpent to create the cosmos. In Egypt creation begins and ends with Atum and Osiris (now Horus?) as two serpents in the dark waters of the formless abyss.

Crowley states: “The rare scents are possibly various ecstasies or Samadhis. Jasmine and Rose are Hieroglyphs of the two main Sacraments, while the emblems of death may refer to certain secrets of a well known exoteric school of initiation whose members, with the rarest exceptions, do not know what it is all about.”

By this he probably means the White and the Red, the male and female sexual secretions, the seed and the egg. He is also ragging on the Freemasons.

The ‘emblems of death’ may perhaps be the skull and crossed bones of ancient Osirian, Pirate, and modern Masonic ritual: one must often confront and pass through symbolic death to achieve initiatory rebirth. Amn. might be the Hindu root-mantra OM or AUM, often spelled ‘Aumgn’ by Crowley for qabalistic reasons (it equals 100); or the Egyptian god Amoun, the hidden one or invisible god. Ho! could seem to imply laughter or joviality, the mystic mantra of Santa Claus. We can only hope it does not refer to that fine-assed Ho’ of Babalon… If such a temple is ever erected, ‘Will he not sink? Amn. Ho! warrior, if thy servant sink?’ may refer to the construction of a crocodile pit for the disposal of failed initiates. Sobek is the Egyptian crocodile god of the Nile.

With ‘means’ we turn to methods, and are exhorted to a fine life and high style of luxury and indulgence, perpetual feasting and drunkenness, delight and debauch. We are encouraged to share in sensuous and erotic delights of all kinds, without any limitations as to partners, timing or location, but to offer up all our ecstasies to Nuit. It is in fact essential that all acts of love and union be offered up to Her. I suspect that sweet and foaming wines are more likely to be champagne than beer, but might be another veiled reference to the biochemical or alchemical elixir of the sexual fluids. The gods always love a good feast.

The bisexual Crowley again, here sounding very contemporary indeed:

‘The Beast 666 ordains by His authority that every man, and every woman, and every intermediately-sexed individual, shall be absolutely free to interpret and communicate Self by means of any sexual practices soever, whether direct or indirect, rational or symbolic, physiologically, legally, ethically, or religiously approved or no, provided only that all parties to any act are fully aware of all implications and responsibilities thereof, and heartily agree thereto.”


52. If this be not aright; if ye confound the space-marks, saying: They are one; or saying, They are many; if the ritual be not ever unto me: then expect the direful judgments of Ra Hoor Khuit!

The space-marks are cosmological or conceptual reference-points, and are often considered to be the eightfold compass-rose marking of the directions which orient our sacred space around the center; consider the recent vitality of the eight-arrowed symbol of the Chaosphere. In Vodou the four main points may represent the rhythms of the Rada rites and the in-between points the offbeat drumming of the Petro spirits. A.O. Spare made use of “the sacred in-betweeness concepts”. Between darkness and light is shifting shadow, the weaving and woven fabric of magick itself.

The cosmic conception of the One and the Many is apparently superseded by the Thelemic formula of 0 = 2. Again it is emphasized that all rites are devoted to Nuit as the ‘visible object of worship’, as Hadit remains the invisible and subjective observer. Ra-Hoor-Khuit maintains this discipline, and the Last Judgment is another name for the Atu retitled the Aeon.


53. This shall regenerate the world, the little world my sister, my heart & my tongue, unto whom I send this kiss. Also, o scribe and prophet, though thou be of the princes, it shall not assuage thee nor absolve thee. But ecstasy be thine and joy of earth: ever To me! To me!

The regeneration of the world may portray ecological concerns, in addition to the more spiritual sense of a new heaven and a new earth, or a Nude World Order. The scribe is (quite accurately) warned that his destiny remains stormy, but is promised ecstasy and joy (Nu & Had, heaven & earth?) in recompense. Starry Nuit’s joyous refrain of ‘To me! To me!’ is introduced, Her most sacred mantra; and the formula of ‘heart & tongue’ again reappears, as well as that very interesting word assuage’:
“Oh, yeah! Assuage me harder, baby!”

Crowley also adds some Greek qabala:

“The last words "ever To me! To me!" have a double sense. My motto at that time was OV MH - "No! certainly not," the "Not That! Not That!" of certain very exalted Hindu mystics. Our Lady of the Stars not only calls me to Her, but bestows upon me as a name 'To me' - To {Mu-eta} - "The Not", the Attainment of that Aspiration expressed in my motto. And {To Mu-eta} adds to 418!”

To be clear on this point, he is saying that ‘TO ME’ in Greek means ‘The Not’.


54. Change not as much as the style of a letter; for behold! thou, o prophet, shalt not behold all these mysteries hidden therein.

Another warning regarding the sanctity of the text, and that there will be revelations found after Crowley himself. The vast importance of the individual letters points to the almost universal usage of esoteric and number symbolism in sacred alphabets: in Egyptian hieroglyphs, Greek scripts, Norse runes, Celtic oghams, Hebrew qabala, Spare’s sigilic alphabet of desire, or the garland of Sanskrit letters worn by Kali.


55. The child of thy bowels, he shall behold them.

This is a prophecy interpreted by Crowley to imply the coming of a magical child to be his heir, and he sought to find, spawn or manifest one for the rest of his life; Jones (Frater Achad) and Parsons (Frater Belarion) were both considered candidates, although Crowley rather typically ignored the strong possibility of a female disciple in spite of a clear warning to expect the unexpected in the following verse.
The reference to ‘thy bowels’ might involve homosexual sex magick, which Crowley generally encoded in his journal as p.v.n. (‘per vas nefandum’, or ‘by the unmentionable vessel’: anal intercourse).


56. Expect him not from the East, nor from the West; for from no expected house cometh that child. Aum! All words are sacred and all prophets true; save only that they understand a little; solve the first half of the equation, leave the second unattacked. But thou hast all in the clear light, and some, though not all, in the dark.

‘not from the East, nor from the West ‘ implies neither Oriental nor Occidental cultural supremacy. ‘All words are sacred and all prophets true‘ has always struck me as a most excellent and deeply charming and heartfelt Unitarian statement, and clearly refutes those who would limit AL to an authoritarian (or fascist) discourse. I suspect that the ‘clear light’ refers to the revelations of the world’s various prophets, while the ‘dark’ implies the diamond void of emptiness that underlies all human doctrines (or perhaps is merely ignorance). The Known and the Unknown? LITTLE as 30+10+9+9+30+5 = 93.


57. Invoke me under my stars! Love is the law, love under will. Nor let the fools mistake love; for there are love and love. There is the dove, and there is the serpent. Choose ye well! He, my prophet, hath chosen, knowing the law of the fortress, and the great mystery of the House of God.
All these old letters of my Book are aright; but {TzADDI} is not the Star. This also is secret: my prophet shall reveal it to the wise.

In the manuscript Tzaddi/90 (then attributed to the tarot atu of the Star) is written as a Hebrew letter. Invoking under the open sky is an imperative. ‘Love is the law, love under will!’ is the balancing completion of ‘Do what thou wilt’, the other half of the equation. The dove would appear to be spiritual love (greek ‘charis’) and the serpent physical congress (greek ‘eros’), the two sides of human nature, which fools and lovers so ceaselessly confound.

Motta, however, sees Dove or Serpent as either heterosexual or homosexual love and oddly also notes “The general key is that you should practice homosexuality only with a fellow Thelemite.” That probably narrows the field a bit…

One of the more poignant things an ex-girlfriend has ever said to me was:
“But why is it Love UNDER Will?”

The Fortress or House of God are other names for the Atu called the Lightning-Struck Tower (Pe/80), which is ascribed to Mars and thus a key to the warlike aspect of Horus; it is also clearly a phallic symbol, or the human spine which can be seen as the axis of chakras which the Kundalini ascends, or the Egyptian symbol of the Djed or backbone of Osiris, which was ritually erected as a pillar and often worn as an amulet. This leads into more mysteries of the Tarot, whose order is declared to be essentially correct with the exception of Tzaddi/90, a deep qabalistic conundrum concerning the order of the trumps which our Beastie Boy attempted to solve in the manner of the ‘double loop in the zodiac’ described in his Book of Thoth, and summarized here:

“Tzaddi is the letter of The Emperor, the Trump IV, and He is the Star, the Trump XVII. Aquarius and Aries are therefore counterchanged, revolving on the pivot of Pisces, just as, in the Trumps VIII and XI, Leo and Libra do about Virgo. This last revelation makes our Tarot attributions sublimely, perfectly, flawlessly symmetrical.”


58. I give unimaginable joys on earth: certainty, not faith, while in life, upon death; peace unutterable, rest, ecstasy; nor do I demand aught in sacrifice.

Joy is the constant theme of AL, though the verse perhaps leaves open the question of an afterlife (other than the fact that nirvana in its original meaning was cessation or extinction). Oblivion might actually come as something of a relief. Sacrifice is happily declared obsolete, at least until we reach the gory bits in Chapter III...

Much more specifically, Crowley says:

“These joys are principally (1) the Beatific Vision, in which Beauty is constantly present to the recipient of Her grace, together with a calm and unutterable joy; (2) the Vision of Wonder, in which the whole Mystery of the Universe is constantly understood and admired for its Ingenium and Wisdom. (1) is referred to Tiphareth, the Grade of Adept; (2) to Binah, the Grade of Master of the Temple.
The certainty concerning death is conferred by the Magical Memory, and various Experiences without which Life is unintelligible.
"Peace unutterable" is given by the Trance in which Matter is destroyed; "rest" by that which finally equilibrates Motion. "Ecstasy" refers to a Trance which combines these.
"Nor do I demand aught in sacrifice"--the ritual of worship is Samadhi. But see later, verse 61.”


59. My incense is of resinous woods and gums; and there is no blood therein: because of my hair the trees of Eternity.

The offering unto Nuit is incense, smoke rising in the air toward space, made from plants or trees; we might often view the goddess as Flora and the god as Faunus in biological terms of plant- and animal-based life forms. The trees making up her hair recall the qabalistic Tree of Life, which in the microcosmic sense is the human body, and the tree is a metaphor for the human being in several mythologies, notably the Norse. The human race would thus form the living crown of our Lady’s flowing hair, and I note several other references to hair in AL. Burning offerings of a rare and valuable substance is an extremely old human custom.

In Egypt… the sycamore fig… was regarded as a manifestation of the sky goddess. Its foliage and shade signify rest and peace in the life beyond; sometimes the souls of the deceased were thought to be birds that lived in its branches.”
-Herder Symbol Dictionary


60. My number is 11, as all their numbers who are of us. The Five Pointed Star, with a Circle in the Middle, & the circle is Red. My colour is black to the blind, but the blue & gold are seen of the seeing. Also I have a secret glory for them that love me.

Eleven, as the ‘one beyond ten’, is the number of magick in Crowley’s thought; the ten spheres of the qabalistic tree now include the activation of the 11th non-sphere or gateway to beyond of Daath or Knowledge (Gnosis).

The five-pointed star or pentagram is a very ancient symbol of arcane energy worldwide, first documented as early as 3,000 BCE in Mesopotamia and later in Greece, and shows our basic structure as human beings (two arms, two legs, and the customary head). To the Pythagoreans it symbolized health and knowledge, and it was sacred to the goddess Hygieia; the formula SALUS or ‘health’ is often inscribed within its points. Its 5-fold structure symbolizes the 5 classical planets (aside from Sol and Luna) and the 5 elements and the 5 senses. There are hidden mathematical mysteries of geometry encoded in its proportions: it is said to be the simplest regular star polygon and as such it always contains ten points (the five points of the star and the five vertices of the inner pentagon) and fifteen line segments:

“Each intersection of edges sections the edges in the Golden Ratio”
or Golden Mean, the Fibonacci series, wherein each new number is the sum of the two previous numbers: “the ratio of the length of the edge to the longer segment is φ, as is the length of the longer segment to the shorter. Also, the ratio of the length of the shorter segment to the segment bounded by the 2 intersecting edges (a side of the pentagon in the pentagram's center) is φ… The pentagram includes ten isosceles triangles: five acute and five obtuse isosceles triangles. In all of them, the ratio of the longer side to the shorter side is φ. The acute triangles are golden triangles.” (Wikipedia)

The spiraling pattern of growth called the Fibonacci series appears everywhere in nature, in fetal development, seashells, leaves and flower petals, pinecones, the muscles of the heart and the ratio of male to female bees in hives. It also forms the basis of much sacred architecture; and as many ancient civilizations knew, the apparent path of the planet Venus (which is both the Evening and Morning Star) forms a pentagram in the sky every 8 years (or 99 lunar cycles). The pentagram appears in many forms of talisman, including rings, pendants and the gnostic Abraxas gems. As both the ‘Devil’s Footprint’ and also a symbol of the 5 wounds of Christ, it was seen as protection from witchcraft in medieval times; while in modern Wicca it has become the best-known symbol of the Craft itself, which is in turn perhaps the most widespread public manifestation of the 20th century occult revival. We should recall that Wicca’s founder Gerald Gardner was a member of the O.T.O. and a friend of Crowley, and that his earliest versions of the ‘Charge of the Goddess’ quoted from the Book of the Law. Spare also identified with the witch-cult, and considering that all three of these men knew each other is very interesting indeed: the fathers of Thelema, Wicca and Chaos magick, three major contemporary strands.

Crowley would have made much use of pentagrams in the invoking and banishing rituals of the Golden Dawn later incorporated into the A.A. and O.T.O., and also found it familiar in Freemasonry. It is a religious symbol in the ancient Near East as well as in China and Japan, where it encodes the 5-element system of Taoism; and is used in Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, Bahai and Neopaganism as well as Thelema. In Egypt the hieroglyph of the star was usually drawn simply as 5 straight lines radiating from a central point.

The red circle in the center is the Sun or the pool of magical power; red is often considered the fundamental or base color of the spectrum, related to life’s blood and fiery energy. In many cultures it is the quintessential hue of magick, most notably in the Typhonian tradition of graeco-egyptian sorcery, in Norse rune lore, and in left-hand tantra. No doubt it also refers to the Scarlet Woman.

Black is the ultimate shade of the night-sky, blue and gold of the solar day, thus Nu and Had. Each individual must discover his or her own secret glory. Alternatively, to the unawakened the universe is ‘black to the blind’ who see only empty space and dead matter, while adepts see living stars, each linked to every other star by rays and waves of light.

Crowley says: “The uninitiated perceive only darkness in Night; the wise perceive the golden stars in the vault of azure.”

Also, Rose via Aiwass provided part of this verse. Crowley again, writing in the third person:

“Again in chapter 1, on page 19, Crowley writes, (Lost 1 phrase) The shape of my star is—. Later, it was Rose who filled in the lost phrase: The Five Pointed Star, with a Circle in the Middle, & the circle is Red. (AL I:60)”

“In the original MSS. the second paragraph begins "The shape of my star is" -- and then breaks off -- the Scribe was unable to hear what was being said. This was presumably because his mind was so full of preconceived ideas about the different kinds of stars appropriate to various ideas. An alternate phrase was subsequently dictated to the Scarlet Woman, and inserted in the manuscript by her own hand.
This star is the pentagram, with the single point at the top. The points touch the parts of Nuith's body as shown in the Stele. The earth-point marks the position of her feet, the fire-point, that of her hands, the other three points -- air, spirit, and water respectively -- refer to "my secret centre, my heart, and my tongue."


61. But to love me is better than all things: if under the night-stars in the desert thou presently burnest mine incense before me, invoking me with a pure heart, and the Serpent flame therein, thou shalt come a little to lie in my bosom. For one kiss wilt thou then be willing to give all; but whoso gives one particle of dust shall lose all in that hour. Ye shall gather goods and store of women and spices; ye shall wear rich jewels; ye shall exceed the nations of the earth in splendour & pride; but always in the love of me, and so shall ye come to my joy. I charge you earnestly to come before me in a single robe, and covered with a rich headdress. I love you! I yearn to you! Pale or purple, veiled or voluptuous, I who am all pleasure and purple, and drunkenness of the innermost sense, desire you. Put on the wings, and arouse the coiled splendour within you: come unto me!

This beautiful verse, with its important numeration of 61 (AIN or NIA) reveals the entire secret ritual of Nuit; Crowley expanded this into the important instruction Liber NU s.f. XI (go read it!), which gives a full account of the practices leading to the attainment of union with Her (HER = 210, as does ART and NOX or Night, the opposite formula to LUX or Light; 2,1,0 is a countdown of Duality into Unity into Nothingness). The ‘desert’ (of Set) and the giving of ‘one particle of dust’ may imply the Crossing of the Abyss.

The ‘single robe’ is an intact and charged aura and the ‘rich headdress’ the thousand-petalled lotus or Sahasrara Chakra. ‘Put on the wings’ refers to the Ajna Chakra or Third Eye, usually depicted with two petals and looking essentially identical to the winged globe of Hadit. The ‘coiled splendour within you’ is the Kundalini or Fire Snake, or Heka the power of Magick (AL = HEKA = 31 = KIA = LA = KHU).
The City at Night may also be a Desert.


62. At all my meetings with you shall the priestess say -- and her eyes shall burn with desire as she stands bare and rejoicing in my secret temple -- To me! To me! calling forth the flame of the hearts of all in her love-chant.

The sky-clad state of ritual nudity is often employed in Magical, Tantric, Wiccan and other ritual; it recalls a primal state of social equality, innocence and honesty as well as a charged erotic atmosphere and absence of pretense. The ‘flame of the hearts of all’ is Hadit. Naked women as a religion are just about the best idea ever.


63. Sing the rapturous love-song unto me! Burn to me perfumes! Wear to me jewels! Drink to me, for I love you! I love you!

The ‘rapturous love-song‘ stimulates the sense of hearing; ‘perfumes‘ that of scent; bright ‘jewels‘, vision; ‘drink‘, taste; and ‘love‘ that of touch.


64. I am the blue-lidded daughter of Sunset; I am the naked brilliance of the voluptuous night-sky.

This vision of the Goddess as the physical form of Nature poetically idealizes the universe as a living being, and also recalls the early tendency of western anthropology to define all pagan deities as personifications of natural forces. Astronomical phenomena stellar, lunar and solar are, like ecstasy, a constant underlying theme of Liber AL.


65. To me! To me!

The great mantra of Her worship, the call to interstellar space.


66. The Manifestation of Nuit is at an end.

Again, Liber NU sub figura XI contains the magical and meditational practices for achieving Nuit. The first and last verses of this chapter both emphasize the word of power ‘manifestation’, and Frater Achad seized upon this as a major key.


"Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine,
it is stranger than we can imagine." -Sir Arthur Eddington

"If you would swim on the bosom of the ocean of Truth,
you must reduce yourself to a zero." -Mahatma Gandhi



(the second half appears on the next page)